Literature DB >> 12361448

Effect of compliance with health supervision guidelines among US infants on emergency department visits.

Rosemarie B Hakim1, Donna S Ronsaville.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are few studies that demonstrate the health benefit of compliance with early periodic health supervision.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between emergency department (ED) use and compliance with prevailing guidelines for periodic health supervision for conditions that potentially could be avoided among a national cohort of US children.
DESIGN: This was a historic cohort study that combined maternal and primary care physician reports of the use of preventive care services for infants during the first 7 months of life from the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey and its 1991 Longitudinal Follow-up study. A preventive care scale used in Cox proportional hazards survival regression predicted the time to the first ED visit for selected diagnoses and all-cause visits controlling for illness severity.
RESULTS: Among children with incomplete well-child care in the first 6 months of life, there was an increased risk of having an ED visit for an upper respiratory tract infection (hazard ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-3.2), gastroenteritis (hazard ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-3.0), asthma (hazard ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-4.3), and all-cause ED visits (hazard ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-1.98).
CONCLUSIONS: Because of the positive effect compliance with national guidelines for early well-child care has on lowering the risk of experiencing ED use, national efforts to improve the quality of child health services for young children should focus on increasing compliance with periodic preventive care for young children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12361448     DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.156.10.1015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med        ISSN: 1072-4710


  11 in total

Review 1.  Screening in child health: studies of the efficacy and relevance of preventive care practices.

Authors:  Peter Weber; Oskar Jenni
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Community- versus individual-level indicators to identify pediatric health care need.

Authors:  Cheryl Zlotnick
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  Mothers' Employment Attributes and Use of Preventive Child Health Services.

Authors:  Megan Shepherd-Banigan; Janice F Bell; Anirban Basu; Cathryn Booth-LaForce; Jeffrey R Harris
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.929

4.  Techniques for handling missing data in secondary analyses of large surveys.

Authors:  Diane L Langkamp; Amy Lehman; Stanley Lemeshow
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.107

5.  Trends and characteristics of preventive care visits among commercially insured adolescents, 2003-2010.

Authors:  Yuping Tsai; Fangjun Zhou; Pascale Wortley; Abigail Shefer; Shannon Stokley
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 4.406

6.  Children's compliance with American Academy of Pediatrics' well-child care visit guidelines and the early detection of autism.

Authors:  Amy M Daniels; David S Mandell
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2013-12

7.  Factors related to receipt of well-child visits in insured children.

Authors:  Amber M Goedken; Julie M Urmie; Linnea A Polgreen
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-04

8.  Preterm Infant Attendance at Health Supervision Visits.

Authors:  Jo Ann D'Agostino; Molly Passarella; Philip Saynisch; Ashley E Martin; Michelle Macheras; Scott A Lorch
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Well-Child Care Attendance and Risk of Asthma Exacerbations.

Authors:  Jason E Lang; Monica Tang; Congwen Zhao; Jillian Hurst; Angie Wu; Benjamin A Goldstein
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  IDEAS for a healthy baby--reducing disparities in use of publicly reported quality data: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sarah L Goff; Penelope S Pekow; Katharine O White; Tara Lagu; Kathleen M Mazor; Peter K Lindenauer
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.