Literature DB >> 12359988

High remaining risk in poorly treated hypertension: the 'rule of halves' still exists.

Lars Weinehall1, Bengt Ohgren, Mats Persson, Birgitta Stegmayr, Kurt Boman, Göran Hallmans, Lars H Lindholm.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To estimate risk factors for stroke, to examine how different categories of patients with increased blood pressure are associated with risk for first-ever stroke event, and to estimate the proportions of these categories in a geographically defined population in northern Sweden.
SETTING: The study was nested within the Västerbotten Intervention Program and the Northern Sweden MONICA cohorts. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: A population-based cross-sectional study and an incident case-control study were carried out. The incident case-control study comprised 129 cases of first-ever stroke diagnosed during 1985-96, with two randomly selected controls per case, chosen from the same geographically defined population. The cross-sectional study was based on 59,735 participants. Blood pressure status was categorized as: normotensive [systolic blood pressure (SBP) <140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) <90 mmHg]; treated and adequately controlled hypertension (SBP <140 mmHg and DBP <90 mmHg); treated but poorly controlled hypertension (SBP > or = 140 mmHg or DBP > or = 90 mmHg, or both); untreated hypertension (SBP > or = 140 mmHg or DBP > or = 90 mmHg, or both); newly detected increased blood pressure (SBP > or = 140 mmHg or DBP > or = 90 mmHg, or both). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Risk for first-ever stroke.
RESULTS: In the cross-sectional study, 68% of individuals were normotensive, 3% had treated and adequately controlled hypertension, 6% had treated but poorly controlled hypertension, 7% had untreated hypertension, and 16% had newly detected increased blood pressure. In univariate analysis of the case-control study, history of diabetes, daily smoking, obesity, increased blood pressure and the hypertension categories 'treated but poorly controlled' and 'untreated' were associated with an increased stroke risk. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, only diabetes and the hypertension categories treated but poorly controlled and untreated remained significant, with odds ratios 6.1 (95% confidence interval 2.4 to 15.3) and 4.3 (95% confidence interval 1.7 to 10.5), respectively. Only one of the 129 individuals who suffered stroke had treated and adequately controlled hypertension.
CONCLUSIONS: The study illustrates the importance of adequate blood pressure control and, at the same time, that the vast majority in the population with increased blood pressure did not receive optimal care. Thus the 'rule of halves' still exists, and the high remaining risk in poorly treated hypertensive individuals in Sweden is remarkable and requires attention from the medical profession.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12359988     DOI: 10.1097/00004872-200210000-00029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  18 in total

1.  Re-evaluating revalidation and appraisal.

Authors:  Mike Pringle
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Severe acute respiratory syndrome--novel virus, recurring theme.

Authors:  Anthony Harnden; Richard Mayon-White
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Special non-clinical interests--GPs in education, research, and management.

Authors:  Amanda Howe; Maureen Baker; Steve Field; Mike Pringle
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension: rule of thirds in the Skaraborg project.

Authors:  Ulf Lindblad; Johanna Ek; Jenny Eckner; Charlotte A Larsson; Guangliang Shan; Lennart Råstam
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.581

5.  GPs' thoughts on prescribing medication and evidence-based knowledge: the benefit aspect is a strong motivator. A descriptive focus group study.

Authors:  Ingmarie Skoglund; Kerstin Segesten; Cecilia Björkelund
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.581

Review 6.  Intermediate versus hard end points in clinical trials on hypertension.

Authors:  Guido Grassi
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.369

7.  The Västerbotten Intervention Programme: background, design and implications.

Authors:  Margareta Norberg; Stig Wall; Kurt Boman; Lars Weinehall
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 2.640

8.  Mis-reporting, previous health status and health status of family may seriously bias the association between food patterns and disease.

Authors:  Agneta Hörnell; Anna Winkvist; Göran Hallmans; Lars Weinehall; Ingegerd Johansson
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 3.271

9.  Drug treatment of hypertension in Sweden in relation to sex, age, and comorbidity.

Authors:  Fredrik Wallentin; Björn Wettermark; Thomas Kahan
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 10.  Renal denervation: ultima ratio or standard in treatment-resistant hypertension.

Authors:  Alexandre Persu; Jean Renkin; Lutgarde Thijs; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 10.190

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.