OBJECTIVE: This study examined implicit sequence learning in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) under dual-task conditions. Frontal-striatal networks support implicit learning and are implicated in the pathophysiology of OCD. Neuroimaging data suggest that during implicit learning, OCD patients use neural systems normally active during explicit learning to compensate for striatal dysfunction. METHOD: The authors examined implicit sequence learning in 25 OCD patients and 25 healthy comparison subjects using a dual-task paradigm, with subjects simultaneously engaged in an explicit memory task and an implicit learning task. They predicted that implicit learning in OCD subjects would be disrupted because concurrent explicit information-processing demands would prevent use of compensatory processes. RESULTS: OCD patients failed to show evidence of implicit learning and exhibited a significant deficit in comparison with healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS: These results are consistent with the hypothesis that concurrent explicit and implicit information-processing demands interfere with implicit learning in OCD patients.
OBJECTIVE: This study examined implicit sequence learning in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) under dual-task conditions. Frontal-striatal networks support implicit learning and are implicated in the pathophysiology of OCD. Neuroimaging data suggest that during implicit learning, OCDpatients use neural systems normally active during explicit learning to compensate for striatal dysfunction. METHOD: The authors examined implicit sequence learning in 25 OCDpatients and 25 healthy comparison subjects using a dual-task paradigm, with subjects simultaneously engaged in an explicit memory task and an implicit learning task. They predicted that implicit learning in OCD subjects would be disrupted because concurrent explicit information-processing demands would prevent use of compensatory processes. RESULTS:OCDpatients failed to show evidence of implicit learning and exhibited a significant deficit in comparison with healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS: These results are consistent with the hypothesis that concurrent explicit and implicit information-processing demands interfere with implicit learning in OCDpatients.
Authors: Katharine A Phillips; Dan J Stein; Scott L Rauch; Eric Hollander; Brian A Fallon; Arthur Barsky; Naomi Fineberg; David Mataix-Cols; Ygor Arzeno Ferrão; Sanjaya Saxena; Sabine Wilhelm; Megan M Kelly; Lee Anna Clark; Anthony Pinto; O Joseph Bienvenu; Joanne Farrow; James Leckman Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Timo D Vloet; Ivo Marx; Berrak Kahraman-Lanzerath; Florian D Zepf; Beate Herpertz-Dahlmann; Kerstin Konrad Journal: J Abnorm Child Psychol Date: 2010-10
Authors: Paul D Arnold; David R Rosenberg; Emanuela Mundo; Subi Tharmalingam; James L Kennedy; Margaret A Richter Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2004-04-09 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Benjamin Kelmendi; Thomas Adams; Ewgeni Jakubovski; Keith A Hawkins; Vladimir Coric; Christopher Pittenger Journal: J Obsessive Compuls Relat Disord Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 1.677
Authors: Jennifer M Sumner; Carolyn G Noack; J Vincent Filoteo; W Todd Maddox; Sanjaya Saxena Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 3.295