Literature DB >> 12359656

Effects of pharyngeal muscle activation on airway pressure-area relationships.

Samuel T Kuna1, Michael J Brennick.   

Abstract

Fiberoptic imaging in an isolated, sealed upper airway was performed in 10 decerebrate cats to determine the effect of pharyngeal muscle activation on airway pressure-area relationships. Bilateral cuff electrodes stimulated the distal cut ends of the following nerves: medial and lateral hypoglossus, glossopharyngeus, and pharyngeal branch of vagus. At given intraluminal pressures ranging from +6 to -6 cm H2O, cross-sectional area was measured in the rostral oropharynx, velopharynx, and caudal oropharynx, with and without nerve stimulation. A mixed model analysis of variance indicated a relatively constant increase in area across the pressure range with glossopharyngeal stimulation at any given level. Significant interactions between pressure and stimulation were present in the rostral oropharynx with medial hypoglossus stimulation and in the caudal oropharynx with independent and combined hypoglossal branch stimulation and pharyngeal branch of vagus stimulation. With stimulation of the hypoglossal nerves, greater increases in area in these regions occurred in the lower pressure ranges. Stimulation of the pharyngeal branch of the vagus caused a greater decrease in area at the higher pressure ranges in the caudal oropharynx and velopharynx. The results indicate that the mechanical effects of pharyngeal muscle activation depend not only on the region and muscles activated but also on the intraluminal pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12359656     DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200203-214OC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  9 in total

1.  Upper airway pressure-flow relationships and pharyngeal constrictor EMG activity during prolonged expiration in awake goats.

Authors:  K D O'Halloran; G E Bisgard
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2008-05-01

2.  PO2-dependent changes in intrinsic and extrinsic tongue muscle activities in the rat.

Authors:  E Fiona Bailey; Patrick L Janssen; Ralph F Fregosi
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-03-18       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Glossopharyngeal long-term facilitation requires serotonin 5-HT2 and NMDA receptors in rats.

Authors:  Ying Cao; Chun Liu; Liming Ling
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 1.931

Review 4.  Mechanisms of sleep-disordered breathing: causes and consequences.

Authors:  Richard S T Leung; Vikram R Comondore; Clodagh M Ryan; Daniel Stevens
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 3.657

5.  Pharyngeal airway wall mechanics using tagged magnetic resonance imaging during medial hypoglossal nerve stimulation in rats.

Authors:  Michael J Brennick; Stephen Pickup; Lawrence Dougherty; Jacqueline R Cater; Samuel T Kuna
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Neuromechanical control of the isolated upper airway of mice.

Authors:  Audrey Liu; Luis Pichard; Hartmut Schneider; Susheel P Patil; Philip L Smith; Vsevolod Polotsky; Alan R Schwartz
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2008-07-24

7.  Impediment in upper airway stabilizing forces assessed by phrenic nerve stimulation in sleep apnea patients.

Authors:  F Sériès; E Vérin; T Similowski
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2005-09-07

8.  Oropharyngeal Muscle Exercise Therapy Improves Signs and Symptoms of Post-stroke Moderate Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome.

Authors:  Dongmei Ye; Chen Chen; Dongdong Song; Mei Shen; Hongwei Liu; Surui Zhang; Hong Zhang; Jingya Li; Wenfei Yu; Qiwen Wang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Can respiratory muscle training therapy effectively manage obstructive sleep apnea syndrome after stroke?: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shu-Wen Guo; Chang-Fei Dai; Liang Yu; Xiong-Fei Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.