Literature DB >> 12358109

No functional impairment after Robodoc total hip arthroplasty: gait analysis in 25 patients.

Christian M Bach1, Peter Winter, Michael Nogler, Georg Göbel, Cornelius Wimmer, Michael Ogon.   

Abstract

The Robodoc total hip replacement procedure requires a wider exposure of the proximal femur, especially of the greater trochanter, than the standard procedure. Moreover, the leg must be placed in a rigid leg-holder apparatus to obtain fixation in maximal hip adduction and external rotation. This may impair the hip abductors and reduce hip abduction in the mid- and terminal stance phase of the cycle. In this study we compared patients after Robodoc and conventional total hip arthroplasty with three-dimensional gait analysis (VICON System, Oxford Metrics, Oxford, U.K.) to assess the kinematics of the pelvis and hip. 25 patients underwent total hip replacement by means of the Robodoc total hip arthroplasty system, 25 patients were treated with conventional total hip replacement, and 40 healthy volunteers served as controls. None of the patients undergoing total hip replacement, robotic or conventional, obtained normal kinematic gait patterns 6 months after surgery. However, the reduction in hip abduction did not differ significantly in patients undergoing robotic or conventional total hip arthroplasty, which suggests that the robotic procedure did not impair hip abductor function more than the conventional method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12358109     DOI: 10.1080/00016470216316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  6 in total

1.  Gait and stair function in total and resurfacing hip arthroplasty: a pilot study.

Authors:  M Wade Shrader; Manoshi Bhowmik-Stoker; Marc C Jacofsky; David J Jacofsky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The Use of Robotic-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

Authors:  Jonathan M Vigdorchik; Abhinav K Sharma; Vinay K Aggarwal; Kaitlin M Carroll; Seth A Jerabek
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-09-08

3.  Computer-assisted hip and knee arthroplasty. Navigation and active robotic systems: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2004-02-01

Review 4.  Robotic surgery: disruptive innovation or unfulfilled promise? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the first 30 years.

Authors:  Alan Tan; Hutan Ashrafian; Alasdair J Scott; Sam E Mason; Leanne Harling; Thanos Athanasiou; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery and robotic surgery in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2013-02-20

6.  Tech-trends in orthopedics 2018.

Authors:  Max Gordon
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.717

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.