Literature DB >> 12358046

Surgical and postoperative factors influencing short-term survival of horses following small intestinal resection: 92 cases (1994-2001).

A J Morton1, A T Blikslager.   

Abstract

Although short-term survival rates following small intestinal resection reportedly range from 48-88%, there is little information on predicting which horse may or may not survive small intestinal (SI) resection and anastomosis. The aim of this study was to identify factors that contribute to nonsurvival in horses following small intestinal resection. Medical records of horses which recovered from anaesthesia following SI resection were reviewed. Clinical and surgical variables were evaluated for their association with short-term survival using logistic regression and were reported as odds ratios (OR), including the 95% confidence interval (CI), indicating the likelihood of horses not surviving to hospital discharge. Ninety-two records met the criteria for inclusion. Thirty-six (81.8%) of the horses that underwent jejunojejunostomy (JJ) and 34 (70.8%) of the horses that underwent jejunocaecostomy (JC) survived to discharge. Multiple logistic analysis indicated that postoperative ileus (OR = 29.7; 95% CI 2.5-354.6), repeat celiotomy (OR = 18; CI 1.7-187.6), and an elevated heart rate of > or = 60 beats/min (OR = 5.6; CI 1.5-20.6) were the principal factors associated with nonsurvival. A low total plasma protein of <55 g/l (OR = 1.8; CI 0.-7.6) was incorporated in the final model because its inclusion improved the overall validity of the model, Clinicians should be aware of the factors associated with the greatest likelihood of nonsurvival following small intestinal resection, so that they can institute aggressive treatment and accurately inform owners on the likelihood of survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12358046     DOI: 10.2746/042516402776117700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Equine Vet J        ISSN: 0425-1644            Impact factor:   2.888


  7 in total

1.  Clinical findings, diagnoses, and outcomes of horses presented for colic to a referral hospital in Atlantic Canada (2000-2015).

Authors:  Jaclyn M Kaufman; Omid Nekouei; Aimie J Doyle; Nora M Biermann
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Clinical evaluation of a closed, one-stage, stapled, functional, end-to-end jejuno-ileal anastomosis in 5 horses.

Authors:  Stacy L Anderson; James T Blackford; S Gal Kelmer
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Packed cell volume and heart rate to predict medical and surgical cases and their short-term survival in horses with gastrointestinal-induced colic.

Authors:  Vesna Kadunc Kos; Petra Kramaric; Maja Brloznik
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 1.075

4.  Effect of three different needle holders on gastrointestinal anastomosis construction time and bursting pressure in equine jejunal segments.

Authors:  Kate Averay; Gaby van Galen; Michael Ward; Denis Verwilghen
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Short-term survival rates of 1397 horses referred for colic from 2010 to 2018.

Authors:  Emma Dybkjær; Kirstine Fleng Steffensen; Marie Louise Honoré; Mathias Ankjær Dinesen; Mogens Teken Christophersen; Tina Holberg Pihl
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 2.048

6.  Has intravenous lidocaine improved the outcome in horses following surgical management of small intestinal lesions in a UK hospital population?

Authors:  Shebl E Salem; Chris J Proudman; Debra C Archer
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  A wireless endoscopy capsule suitable for imaging of the equine stomach and small intestine.

Authors:  Mei Steinmann; Rebecca J Bezugley; Stephanie L Bond; Jill S Pomrantz; Renaud Léguillette
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 3.333

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.