BACKGROUND: Data on the prevalence of orthostatic intolerance (OI) in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) are limited and controversial. We tested the hypothesis that a majority of CFS patients exhibit OI during head-up tilt. METHODS: Hemodynamic and neurohumoral responses to 40 minutes of head-up tilt were studied in 36 CFS patients and 36 healthy controls. Changes in stroke volume, cardiac output and peripheral vascular resistance were estimated from finger arterial pressure waveform analysis (Modelflow). Blood samples were drawn before and at the end of head-up tilt for measurement of plasma catecholamines. RESULTS: At baseline, supine heart rate was higher in CFS patients (CFS: 66.4 +/- 8.4 bpm; controls: 57.4 +/- 6.6 bpm; p < 0.001) as was the plasma epinephrine level (CFS: 0.11 +/- 0.07 nmol/l; controls: 0.08 +/- 0.07 nmol/l: p = 0.015). An abnormal blood pressure and/or heart rate response to head-up tilt was seen in 10 (27.8 %) CFS patients (6 presyncope, 2 postural tachycardia, 2 tachycardia and presyncope) and 6 (16.7 %, p = 0.26) controls (5 presyncope, 1 tachycardia, 2 tachycardia and presyncope). Head-up tilt-negative CFS patients showed a larger decrease in stroke volume during tilt (-46.9 +/- 10.6) than head-up tilt-negative controls (-40.3 +/- 13.6 %, p = 0.008). Plasma catecholamine responses to head-up tilt did not differ between these groups. CONCLUSION: Head-up tilt evokes postural tachycardia or (pre)syncope in a minority of CFS patients. The observations in head-up tilt-negative CFS patients of a higher heart rate at baseline together with a marked decrease in stroke volume in response to head-up tilt may point to deconditioning.
BACKGROUND: Data on the prevalence of orthostatic intolerance (OI) in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) are limited and controversial. We tested the hypothesis that a majority of CFS patients exhibit OI during head-up tilt. METHODS: Hemodynamic and neurohumoral responses to 40 minutes of head-up tilt were studied in 36 CFS patients and 36 healthy controls. Changes in stroke volume, cardiac output and peripheral vascular resistance were estimated from finger arterial pressure waveform analysis (Modelflow). Blood samples were drawn before and at the end of head-up tilt for measurement of plasma catecholamines. RESULTS: At baseline, supine heart rate was higher in CFS patients (CFS: 66.4 +/- 8.4 bpm; controls: 57.4 +/- 6.6 bpm; p < 0.001) as was the plasma epinephrine level (CFS: 0.11 +/- 0.07 nmol/l; controls: 0.08 +/- 0.07 nmol/l: p = 0.015). An abnormal blood pressure and/or heart rate response to head-up tilt was seen in 10 (27.8 %) CFS patients (6 presyncope, 2 postural tachycardia, 2 tachycardia and presyncope) and 6 (16.7 %, p = 0.26) controls (5 presyncope, 1 tachycardia, 2 tachycardia and presyncope). Head-up tilt-negative CFS patients showed a larger decrease in stroke volume during tilt (-46.9 +/- 10.6) than head-up tilt-negative controls (-40.3 +/- 13.6 %, p = 0.008). Plasma catecholamine responses to head-up tilt did not differ between these groups. CONCLUSION: Head-up tilt evokes postural tachycardia or (pre)syncope in a minority of CFS patients. The observations in head-up tilt-negative CFS patients of a higher heart rate at baseline together with a marked decrease in stroke volume in response to head-up tilt may point to deconditioning.
Authors: Italo Biaggioni; Cyndya A Shibao; André Diedrich; James A S Muldowney; Cheryl L Laffer; Jens Jordan Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2019-12-10 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Even Fagermoen; Dag Sulheim; Anette Winger; Anders M Andersen; Johannes Gjerstad; Kristin Godang; Peter C Rowe; J Philip Saul; Eva Skovlund; Vegard Bruun Wyller Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2015-09-10 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: Maximillian J Nelson; Jasvir S Bahl; Jonathan D Buckley; Rebecca L Thomson; Kade Davison Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 1.817