Literature DB >> 12357145

Does the A118G polymorphism at the mu-opioid receptor gene protect against morphine-6-glucuronide toxicity?

Jörn Lötsch1, Michael Zimmermann, Jutta Darimont, Claudia Marx, Rafael Dudziak, Carsten Skarke, Gerd Geisslinger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Some, but not all, patients with renal dysfunction suffer from side effects after morphine administration because of accumulation of the active metabolite morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G). The current study aims to identify genetic causes that put patients at risk for, or protect them from, opioid side effects related to high plasma M6G. Candidate genetic causes are the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) A118G of the mu-opioid-receptor gene (OPRM1), which has recently been identified to result in decreased potency of M6G, and mutations in the MDR1-gene coding P-glycoprotein, of which morphine and M6G might be a substrate.
METHODS: Two men, aged 87 and 65 yr, with renal failure (creatinine clearance of 6 and 9 ml/min) received 30 mg/day oral morphine for pain treatment. Both patients had sufficient analgesia from morphine. However, while one patient tolerated morphine well despite high plasma M6G of 1735 nM, in the patient with M6G plasma concentrations of 941 nM it caused severe sleepiness and drowsiness. Patients were genotyped for known SNPs of the OPRM1 and MDR1 genes.
RESULTS: The patient who tolerated morphine well despite high plasma M6G was a homozygous carrier of the mutated G118 allele of the mu-opioid-receptor gene, which has been previously related to decreased M6G potency. In contrast, the patient who suffered from side effects was "wild-type" for this mutation. No other differences were found between the OPRM1 and MDR1 genes.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors hypothesize that the A118G single nucleotide polymorphism of the mu-opioid-receptor is among the protective factors against M6G-related opioid toxicity. The observation encourages the search for pharmacogenetic reasons that cause interindividual variability of the clinical effects of morphine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12357145     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200210000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  30 in total

Review 1.  [Pharmacological aspects of pain research in Germany].

Authors:  E Niederberger; R Kuner; G Geißlinger
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  Gaps and junctions between clinical experience and theoretical framework in the use of opioids.

Authors:  Marianne Kloke
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  [Are polymorphisms in the mu-opioid receptor important for opioid therapy?].

Authors:  J Lötsch; R Freynhagen; G Geisslinger
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 4.  Role of morphine's metabolites in analgesia: concepts and controversies.

Authors:  Erica Wittwer; Steven E Kern
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 5.  [Genetics, pain and analgesia].

Authors:  U Stamer; B Bayerer; F Stüber
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Induction of morphine-6-glucuronide synthesis by heroin self-administration in the rat.

Authors:  Maria Meringolo; Valentina Brusadin; Maria T De Luca; Christian Montanari; Christian L Montanari; Letizia Antonilli; Paolo Nencini; Aldo Badiani
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Bioequivalence criteria for transdermal fentanyl generics: do these need a relook?

Authors:  Carmen Walter; Lisa Felden; Jörn Lötsch
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  The Benefits of Genetic Addiction Risk Score (GARS) Testing in Substance Use Disorder (SUD).

Authors:  Kenneth Blum; Edward J Modestino; Marjorie Gondre-Lewis; Edwin J Chapman; Jennifer Neary; David Siwicki; David Baron; Mary Hauser; David E Smith; Alphonse Kenison Roy; Panayotis K Thanos; Bruce Steinberg; Thomas McLaughlin; Lyle Fried; Debmalya Barh; Georgia A Dunston; Rajendra D Badgaiyan
Journal:  Int J Genom Data Min       Date:  2018-01-15

Review 9.  Hypothesizing that brain reward circuitry genes are genetic antecedents of pain sensitivity and critical diagnostic and pharmacogenomic treatment targets for chronic pain conditions.

Authors:  Amanda L-C Chen; Thomas J H Chen; Roger L Waite; Jeffrey Reinking; Howard L Tung; Patrick Rhoades; B William Downs; Eric Braverman; Dasha Braverman; Mallory Kerner; Seth H Blum; Nicholas DiNubile; David Smith; Marlene Oscar-Berman; Thomas J Prihoda; John B Floyd; David O'Brien; H H Liu; Kenneth Blum
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 1.538

10.  [Postoperative pain therapy in orthopedics].

Authors:  M Zimmermann; M Rittmeister
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.