Literature DB >> 12357071

Effects of radioisotopes on the accuracy of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for bone densitometry.

Bryon Mueller1, Michael K O'Connor.   

Abstract

Nuclear medicine procedures are often performed in close-time proximity to bone densitometry studies. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of various radioisotopes on the accuracy of bone mineral density (BMD) measurements performed using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) systems. We evaluated two DEXA scanners: the Hologic QDR4500 and the Lunar Prodigy. The effects of various activities of Tc-99m, Tl-201, Ga-67 and I-131 on BMD were assessed by placing vials or syringes containing the appropriate isotope above or below a simulated spine (average BMD = 1.1 g/cm2) embedded in a lucite block. We also placed a spine phantom (average BMD = 2.0 g/cm2) in a water bath containing various concentrations of Tc-99m. Maximum activities evaluated were as follows: Tc-99m, 80 mCi; I-131, 50 mCi; Tl-201, 66 mCi; Ga-67, 20 mCi. For the Hologic QDR4500 system, irrespective of the radioisotope or activity, we found no significant effect of adjacent activity on measured BMD on this system. For the Lunar Prodigy system, the effects of adjacent activity on BMD were found to be dependent on source location, strength, and radioisotope. For sources placed beneath the solid lucite phantom, BMD decreased by approx 0.5%/10 mCi of activity for all isotopes. In general, for sources placed above the lucite phantom, the BMD decreased by 1.6-4.0%/10 mCi of activity, depending on location. The exception was Tl-201, where BMD increased by 0.5-2.5%/10 mCi, depending on location. With the high-density spine in the water phantom, the effects of adjacent activity were more pronounced than in the standard density spine in the lucite block. For a distributed Tc-99m source, the BMD decreased by 1.7%/10 mCi. The effect of radioactivity on DEXA measurements is system dependent. In general, adjacent activity results in a reduction in apparent BMD. The magnitude of the effect increases with increasing BMD and is dependent on the location of the activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12357071     DOI: 10.1385/jcd:5:3:283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.963


  2 in total

1.  Official position of the Brazilian Association of Bone Assessment and Metabolism (ABRASSO) on the evaluation of body composition by densitometry: part I (technical aspects)-general concepts, indications, acquisition, and analysis.

Authors:  Sergio Setsuo Maeda; Barbara Santarosa Emo Peters; Lígia Araújo Martini; Hannah Karen Moreira Antunes; Maria Cristina Gonzalez; Henrique Pierotti Arantes; Carla M Prado; Camila Lemos Pinto; Iana Mizumukai de Araújo; Francisco José Albuquerque de Paula; Joao Lindolfo Cunha Borges; Ben-Hur Albergaria; Marcela Ushida; Guilherme Cardenaz de Souza; Laura Maria Carvalho de Mendonça; Mirley do Prado; Marcelo de Medeiros Pinheiro
Journal:  Adv Rheumatol       Date:  2022-03-20

2.  Does Bone Mineral Density Differ between Fan-Beam and Pencil-Beam?: A Meta-Analysis and Systemic Review.

Authors:  Byung-Ho Yoon; Young Do Koh; Jun-Il Yoo; Sujin Kim; Guen Young Lee; Sung Bin Park; Yong-Chan Ha
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2021-02-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.