Literature DB >> 12357069

Comparison of two Hologic DXA systems (QDR 1000 and QDR 4500/A) for in vivo bone mass measurement in the baboon (Papio ursinus).

Ilario Dal Mas1, Anna Biscardi, Ugo Ripamonti.   

Abstract

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard for bone mass measurement in humans. New generation osteodensitometers have been introduced and numerous studies have been performed to compare new and old devices for in vivo measurements of bone mineral density (BMD). However similar studies in nonhuman primates have yet to be performed. In this longitudinal study, two generation of osteodensitometers from the same manufacturer (Hologic QDR 1000 and Hologic QDR 4500/A) were used to detect bone changes in a cohort of 24 ovariectomized (OVX) Chacma baboons (Papio ursinus) during a period of 36 mo. Correlation between the same osteodensitometers were also obtained for the lumbar spine (L1-L4) area, BMD, and bone mineral content (BMC) in a cohort of 33 adult female baboons and for the total hip area, BMD, and BMC in a group of 25 adult female baboons. The QDR 1000 to QDR 4500/A area, BMC, and BMD correlation coefficient (r(2)) were 0.848, 0.939, and 0.916, respectively; r(2) for total hip BMD was 0.818. Percentage of variation (PV) among the total vertebral (L1-L4) area measured by the two osteodensitometers was 5.3 +/- 2.3 (mean +/- SD). BMC had the lowest PV and the highest r(2). The mean lumbar BMD was higher when measured by QDR 1000 with a PV% of 7.7 +/- 3.1 (mean +/- SD). The mean hip BMD was higher measured by QDR 1000 with a PV% of 9.3 +/- 7.1 (mean +/- SD). Slopes of two regression lines for the lumbar spine (L1-L4) and total hip BMD were 0.928 and 0.914, respectively. Longitudinal analysis of lumbar BMD in OVX baboons showed that QDR 4500/A detected a significant bone density increase at 36 and 48 mo post- OVX, compared to time 12, whereas the QDR 1000 did not. Our results indicate that both osteodensitometers can be used to measure bone changes in longitudinal studies in primates, but that before upgrading to a newgeneration osteodensitometer, a calibration curve has to be obtained so that both devices can be equally used in regular experimental study in nonhuman primates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12357069     DOI: 10.1385/jcd:5:3:313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.963


  3 in total

1.  Bone mineral measurements of subchondral and trabecular bone in healthy and osteoporotic rabbits.

Authors:  S Castañeda; R Largo; E Calvo; F Rodríguez-Salvanés; M E Marcos; M Díaz-Curiel; G Herrero-Beaumont
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Bone loss in the ovariectomized baboon Papio ursinus: densitometry, histomorphometry and biochemistry.

Authors:  I Dal Mas; A Biscardi; C M Schnitzler; U Ripamonti
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.310

3.  Geographical differences in osteoporosis, obesity, and sarcopenia related traits in white American cohorts.

Authors:  Yu Zhou; Kehao Wu; Hui Shen; Jigang Zhang; Hong-Wen Deng; Lan-Juan Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.