Literature DB >> 12356495

The effects of parallax on geometric morphometric data.

Sarah K Mullin1, Peter J Taylor.   

Abstract

This study questions the use of parallactic images in the field of geometric morphometrics. Landmark data from both standard and distorted images of grids were compared to determine the differences between the data sets. The distorted images resulted from placing the camera too close to the specimen, thereby creating a parallax. Although a statistical significant difference existed between the standard and distorted grids, it was shown that because the parallax was consistent (due to a standardization of the camera set-up), the variation was small enough and the error was constant so that the data could still be used in subsequent geometric morphometric analyses. This could be important in geometric morphometric analyses, particularly when parallaxes in images are detected after the data collection has already begun and it is not plausible to reacquire the specimens.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12356495     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-4825(02)00037-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Biol Med        ISSN: 0010-4825            Impact factor:   4.589


  9 in total

1.  Variation in the shape and mechanical performance of the lower jaws in ceratopsid dinosaurs (Ornithischia, Ceratopsia).

Authors:  Leonardo Maiorino; Andrew A Farke; Tassos Kotsakis; Luciano Teresi; Paolo Piras
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 2.  Measurement error in geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  Carmelo Fruciano
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 0.900

3.  Metrological framework for selecting morphological characters to identify species and estimate developmental maturity of forensically significant insect specimens.

Authors:  John Mark Midgley; Martin Herrer Villet
Journal:  Forensic Sci Res       Date:  2020-09-10

4.  Can morphotaxa be assessed with photographs? Estimating the accuracy of two-dimensional cranial geometric morphometrics for the study of threatened populations of African monkeys.

Authors:  Andrea Cardini; Yvonne A de Jong; Thomas M Butynski
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 2.227

5.  Males Resemble Females: Re-Evaluating Sexual Dimorphism in Protoceratops andrewsi (Neoceratopsia, Protoceratopsidae).

Authors:  Leonardo Maiorino; Andrew A Farke; Tassos Kotsakis; Paolo Piras
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Morphological convergence in 'river dolphin' skulls.

Authors:  Charlotte E Page; Natalie Cooper
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Skull morphological evolution in Malagasy endemic Nesomyinae rodents.

Authors:  Léa Terray; Christiane Denys; Steven M Goodman; Voahangy Soarimalala; Aude Lalis; Raphaël Cornette
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Testing inter-observer error under a collaborative research framework for studying lithic shape variability.

Authors:  Lucy Timbrell; Christopher Scott; Behailu Habte; Yosef Tefera; Hélène Monod; Mouna Qazzih; Benjamin Marais; Wendy Black; Christine Maroma; Emmanuel Ndiema; Struan Henderson; Katherine Elmes; Kimberly Plomp; Matt Grove
Journal:  Archaeol Anthropol Sci       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 2.213

9.  Is torosaurus triceratops? Geometric morphometric evidence of late maastrichtian ceratopsid dinosaurs.

Authors:  Leonardo Maiorino; Andrew A Farke; Tassos Kotsakis; Paolo Piras
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.