Literature DB >> 12356210

Estimating cerebral atrophy in multiple sclerosis patients from various MR pulse sequences.

R Leigh1, J Ostuni, D Pham, A Goldszal, B K Lewis, T Howard, N Richert, H McFarland, J A Frank.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine how measures reflecting cerebral atrophy (CA) are influenced by pulse sequence (PS) and segmentation algorithm (SA) used in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and healthy control (HC)s.
METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans from 10 relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients and five HCs were used to determine the change in brain fractional volume (BFV) over a two-year period. T1-weighted, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), and proton density (PD)/T2-weighted sequences were analysed Image segmentation to determine brain volume was performed using the following a histogram SA, an adaptive fuzzy c-means algorithm (AFCM), and an adaptive Bayesian segmentation with a K-means clustering.
RESULTS: Combinations of the SA and PS in MS patents demonstrated significant differences in the per cent change in BFV from baseline. For the combination of PS and SA the per cent change in BFV for year one and year two varied from +2.05% to - 1.6% and +0.79% to -3.11%, respectively. Analysis of the HCs data revealed fluctuations in BFV varying from +0.26% to -0.29%.
CONCLUSIONS: MRI estimates of CA are dependent on both the type of PS and SA; therefore, the choice of SA technique and PS should be consistent during an MS treatment trial. The progression of CA in MS should only be used as a secondary or tertiary outcome measure in treatment trials until a better understanding of how this measurement is affected by the disease, the image acquisition and analysis techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12356210     DOI: 10.1191/1352458502ms801oa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mult Scler        ISSN: 1352-4585            Impact factor:   6.312


  5 in total

1.  Whole-brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis measured by automated versus semiautomated MR imaging segmentation.

Authors:  Jitendra Sharma; Michael P Sanfilipo; Ralph H B Benedict; Bianca Weinstock-Guttman; Frederick E Munschauer; Rohit Bakshi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Multiple sclerosis: the role of MR imaging.

Authors:  Y Ge
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Whole Brain Volume Measured from 1.5T versus 3T MRI in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Renxin Chu; Shahamat Tauhid; Bonnie I Glanz; Brian C Healy; Gloria Kim; Vinit V Oommen; Fariha Khalid; Mohit Neema; Rohit Bakshi
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2015-06-28       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 4.  Brain Parenchymal Fraction in Healthy Adults-A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Mattias Vågberg; Gabriel Granåsen; Anders Svenningsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  The role of nonconventional magnetic resonance imaging techniques in demyelinating disorders.

Authors:  Francesca Bagnato; Joseph A Frank
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.030

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.