Literature DB >> 12355271

Opposite effects on perception and action induced by the Ponzo illusion.

Robert Bartelt1, Warren G Darling.   

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of the Ponzo illusion on three tasks: manual estimation of target width and peak grip aperture during pantomimed and natural prehension. The targets were three discs of 25 mm height and 20, 40 and 60 mm diameter. Illusory effects on perception were larger and less variable than effects on peak grip aperture during pantomimed reaching, and also were larger and less variable for targets at least 40 mm in diameter. Although a large, statistically significant perceptual illusion in the expected direction was induced for the 60-mm-diameter target, peak grip apertures during reaches to acquire the targets did not significantly differ due to high intersubject variability. However, in two of the six reaching conditions (two reaching tasks x three target sizes), individual differences in illusory effects on perception (perceived width of target placed over converging vs diverging lines) were strongly negatively correlated with individual differences in illusory effects on peak grip aperture during prehension (i.e., if object was perceived to be larger, peak grip aperture during reach was smaller). This unexpected correlation indicates that individuals with larger illusions of increased target size reached with reduced grip apertures. The strong relationship between effects on perception and action in two conditions may indicate shared visual processing by the perceptual and motor systems, with background visual information having opposite effects on the two systems.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12355271     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1198-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  6 in total

1.  Manual size estimation: a neuropsychological measure of perception?

Authors:  V H Franz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Similar effects of a motion-in-depth illusion on manual tracking and perceptual judgements.

Authors:  Joan López-Moliner; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Perceptual judgment and saccadic behavior in a spatial distortion with briefly presented stimuli.

Authors:  Sonja Stork; Jochen Müsseler; A H C van der Heijden
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-02-11

4.  Perception, action, and Roelofs effect: a mere illusion of dissociation.

Authors:  Paul Dassonville; Jagdeep Kaur Bala
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  Dynamic modulation of illusory and physical target size on separate and coordinated eye and hand movements.

Authors:  Christine M Gamble; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Grasping of Real-World Objects Is Not Biased by Ensemble Perception.

Authors:  Annabel Wing-Yan Fan; Lin Lawrence Guo; Adam Frost; Robert L Whitwell; Matthias Niemeier; Jonathan S Cant
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-04-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.