Literature DB >> 12354991

Acute cardiac transplant rejection: detection and grading with MR imaging with a blood pool contrast agent--experimental study in the rat.

Lars Johansson1, Cecilia Johnsson, Eva Penno, Atle Björnerud, Håkan Ahlström.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the possibility of detecting cardiac transplant rejection and determining its degree of severity with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with a blood pool contrast agent.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rat allogeneic (PVG to Wistar/Kyoto, n = 9) and syngeneic (Wistar/Kyoto to Wistar/Kyoto, n = 6) heterotopic heart transplantations were performed. On the 2nd and 6th postoperative days, an ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide, or USPIO, contrast agent was injected intravenously at a dose of 2 mg of iron per kilogram of body weight. The injection was followed by three-dimensional T1-weighted MR imaging of the heart grafts with an imaging time of approximately 2 minutes for each image for 44 minutes. The signal intensity (SI) was measured in the myocardium over time, and the relative enhancement was calculated. After the 6th day, the rats were sacrificed, and the morphology of the transplanted hearts was assessed histologically. The CIs for the difference of the means on day 2 and day 6 were calculated by using a bootstrap technique, and the correlation between the relative SI change and the histologically determined degree of rejection were calculated with the Spearman rank order correlation coefficient.
RESULTS: On day 6, a statistically significant difference between the groups was found at 4 minutes after injection of the contrast agent and increased with increasing time after injection. The mean percentage change in SI at the last time point for the allogeneic group on day 2 was -8.7% (SD, 8.5) and for the syngeneic group was -6.6% (SD, 6.0). On day 6, the allogeneic group had a relative SI change of 17.7% (SD, 8.7), whereas the syngeneic group had a change of -7.4% (SD, 2.6). There was a significant difference between only the two groups on day 6 (P <.001). Furthermore, in the allogeneic group the histologically determined degree of rejection correlated positively with the relative SI enhancement (r = 0.89, P <.005).
CONCLUSION: Acutely rejecting heart transplants can be distinguished from nonrejecting ones in an animal model with MR imaging and a blood pool contrast agent. In addition, the relative SI enhancement reflects the histologically determined degree of rejection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12354991     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2251010698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  9 in total

Review 1.  Current status of cardiac MRI in small animals.

Authors:  J-P Vallée; M K Ivancevic; D Nguyen; D R Morel; M Jaconi
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2004-12-16       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Evaluation of perfusion and viability in hypothermic non-beating isolated porcine hearts using cardiac MRI.

Authors:  Andrew L Rivard; Cory M Swingen; Robert P Gallegos; Daniel L Gatlin; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Ranjit John; Richard W Bianco
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  A comparison of myocardial perfusion and rejection in cardiac transplant patients.

Authors:  Andrew L Rivard; Cory M Swingen; Donnevan Blake; Andrea S Huang; Pooja Kanth; Grete F Thomsen; Erin J Cordova; Leslie W Miller; Richard W Bianco; Norbert Wilke
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Cellular and Functional Imaging of Cardiac Transplant Rejection.

Authors:  Yijen L Wu; Qing Ye; Chien Ho
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2011-02-01

5.  Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography without Gadolinium-based Contrast Material: Clinical Applications Using Ferumoxytol.

Authors:  Mohammad H Jalili; Tiffany Yu; Cameron Hassani; Ashley E Prosper; J Paul Finn; Arash Bedayat
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2022-08-04

6.  Molecular imaging of innate immune cell function in transplant rejection.

Authors:  Thomas Christen; Matthias Nahrendorf; Moritz Wildgruber; Filip K Swirski; Elena Aikawa; Peter Waterman; Koichi Shimizu; Ralph Weissleder; Peter Libby
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of acute heart transplant rejection: a review.

Authors:  Craig R Butler; Richard Thompson; Mark Haykowsky; Mustafa Toma; Ian Paterson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  The challenge to detect heart transplant rejection and transplant vasculopathy non-invasively - a pilot study.

Authors:  Engin Usta; Christof Burgstahler; Hermann Aebert; Stephen Schroeder; Uwe Helber; Andreas F Kopp; Gerhard Ziemer
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2009-08-16       Impact factor: 1.637

9.  Ferumoxytol-enhanced MRI in patients with prior cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  Colin G Stirrat; Shirjel Alam; Thomas J MacGillivray; Calum Gray; Marc Richard Dweck; Victor Jones; William Wallace; John R Payne; Sanjay K Prasad; Roy S Gardner; Mark C Petrie; Saeed Mirsadraee; Peter Henriksen; David E Newby; Scott Semple
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2019-10-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.