Literature DB >> 12354799

Detection of methicillin and mupirocin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates using conventional and molecular methods: a descriptive study from a burns unit with high prevalence of MRSA.

P U Krishnan1, K Miles, N Shetty.   

Abstract

AIMS: To compare conventional phenotypic methods for the detection of methicillin and mupirocin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus in routine laboratory practice with reference to an established molecular method.
METHODS: This study was conducted on a selection of 65 isolates of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from a burns unit in India which is endemic for MRSA. The Kirby-Bauer and modified Stokes disc diffusion tests and the Vitek breakpoint minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) were performed on all isolates using the presence of the mecA gene as the reference standard. Gel based and colorimetric polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays were evaluated as molecular methods for the diagnosis of MRSA. A commercial latex agglutination test, the Mastalex, was assessed for the detection of penicillin binding protein 2a (PBP2a), the mecA gene product. Conventional disc diffusion and molecular methods were investigated for the detection of mupirocin resistance.
RESULTS: Fifty one of 65 isolates were positive for the mecA gene. All three phenotypic methods showed high sensitivity (> 96.2%), whereas the specificity varied: 50% for Kirby-Bauer, 87.5% for modified Stokes, and 93.3% for Vitek. The colorimetric PCR was less cumbersome than the gel based PCR; there was complete concordance between both systems. The Mastalex kit showed good correlation with PCR. One isolate was found to be mupirocin resistant and harboured the mupA gene.
CONCLUSIONS: The specificity of routine laboratory tests for MRSA detection was variable. mecA gene detection, the "gold standard" to confirm ambiguous results, is difficult to perform in routine diagnostic laboratories. The Mastalex kit for the detection of PBP2a is an alternative that could be used in most laboratories. High level mupirocin resistance can be confirmed with genotypic methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12354799      PMCID: PMC1769775          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.55.10.745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  14 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Mastalex latex agglutination test for methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus grown on different screening media.

Authors:  D F Brown; E Walpole
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Detection of methicillin/oxacillin resistance in staphylococci.

Authors:  D F Brown
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  The Vitek analyser for routine bacterial identification and susceptibility testing: protocols, problems, and pitfalls.

Authors:  N Shetty; G Hill; G L Ridgway
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Diagnosis and management of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection.

Authors:  G J Duckworth
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-10-23

5.  Rapid detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates by the MRSA-screen latex agglutination test.

Authors:  W B van Leeuwen; C van Pelt; A Luijendijk; H A Verbrugh; W H Goessens
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Rapid slide latex agglutination test for detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  A van Griethuysen; M Pouw; N van Leeuwen; M Heck; P Willemse; A Buiting; J Kluytmans
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Detection of methicillin-resistant staphylococci by using the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  S Unal; J Hoskins; J E Flokowitsch; C Y Wu; D A Preston; P L Skatrud
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Methicillin resistance in staphylococci: molecular and biochemical basis and clinical implications.

Authors:  H F Chambers
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 26.132

9.  Comparison of tests for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a clinical microbiology laboratory.

Authors:  S Unal; K Werner; P DeGirolami; F Barsanti; G Eliopoulos
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Evaluation of disc diffusion and Etest for determining the susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to mupirocin.

Authors:  M F Palepou; A P Johnson; B D Cookson; H Beattie; A Charlett; N Woodford
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.790

View more
  8 in total

1.  Development of a latex agglutination test for norovirus detection.

Authors:  Heetae Lee; YoungBin Park; Misoon Kim; Youngmee Jee; Doo-Sung Cheon; Hae Sook Jeong; GwangPyo Ko
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 3.422

2.  Genotyping of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains from two hospitals in Bangalore, South India.

Authors:  Gayathri Arakere; Savitha Nadig; Göte Swedberg; Ragini Macaden; Satish K Amarnath; Dasarathy Raghunath
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Expert systems in clinical microbiology.

Authors:  Trevor Winstanley; Patrice Courvalin
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Comparison of real-time PCR with disk diffusion, agar screen and E-test methods for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Laleh Shariati; Majid Validi; Mohammad Amin Tabatabaiefar; Ali Karimi; Mohammad Reza Nafisi
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 2.188

5.  High prevalence of direct repeat unit types of 10di, 8 h and 8i among methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains with staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type IIIA isolated in Tehran, Iran.

Authors:  Mitra Motallebi; Fereshteh Jabalameli; Reza Beigverdi; Mohammad Emaneini
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.887

6.  Comparison of PCR and phenotypic methods for the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Anitha Madhavan; Arun Sachu; Anukumar Balakrishnan; Anu Vasudevan; Sobha Balakrishnan; Jayalakshmi Vasudevapanicker
Journal:  Iran J Microbiol       Date:  2021-02

7.  Prevalence of Mupirocin Resistance Among Staphylococci, its Clinical Significance and Relationship to Clinical Use.

Authors:  Manohar Shoorashetty Rudresh; Giriyapur Siddappa Ravi; Aravind Motagi; Ann Mary Alex; Parthasarathi Sandhya; Bangalore Viswanath Navaneeth
Journal:  J Lab Physicians       Date:  2015 Jul-Dec

8.  Molecular Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus by Non-Protein Coding RNA-Mediated Monoplex Polymerase Chain Reaction.

Authors:  Cheryl Yeap Soo Yean; Kishanraj Selva Raju; Rathinam Xavier; Sreeramanan Subramaniam; Subash C B Gopinath; Suresh V Chinni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.