Literature DB >> 12354668

Compositional patterns in reptilian genomes.

Sandrine Hughes1, Oliver Clay, Giorgio Bernardi.   

Abstract

Sauropsids form a complex group of vertebrates including squamates (lizards and snakes), turtles, crocodiles, sphenodon and birds (which are often considered as a separate class). Although avian genomes have been relatively well studied, the genomes of the other groups have remained only sparsely characterized. Moreover, the nuclear sequences available in databanks are still very limited. In the present study, we have analysed the compositional patterns, i.e. the GC (molar fraction of guanine and cytosine in DNA) distributions, of 31 reptilian (particularly snake) genomes by analytical ultracentrifugation of DNAs in CsCl gradients. The profiles were characterized by their modal buoyant density rho(o), mean buoyant density < rho>, asymmetry < rho>- rho(o), and heterogeneity H. The modal buoyant density distribution of reptilian DNAs clearly distinguishes two groups. The snakes fall in the same range of modal densities as most mammals, whereas crocodiles, turtles and lizards show higher values (>1.700 g/cm(3)). As far as the more important compositional properties of asymmetry and heterogeneity are concerned, previous studies showed that amphibians and fishes share relatively low values, whereas birds and mammals are characterized by highly heterogeneous and asymmetric patterns (with the exception of Muridae, which have a lower heterogeneity). The present results show that the snake genomes cover a broad range of asymmetry and heterogeneity values, whereas the genomes of crocodiles and turtles cover a narrow range that is intermediate between those of fishes/amphibians and those of mammals/birds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12354668     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1119(02)00732-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene        ISSN: 0378-1119            Impact factor:   3.688


  6 in total

1.  Using analytical ultracentrifugation to study compositional variation in vertebrate genomes.

Authors:  Oliver Clay; Christophe J Douady; Nicolas Carels; Sandrine Hughes; Giuseppe Bucciarelli; Giorgio Bernardi
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2003-04-09       Impact factor: 1.733

2.  Phylogenomics of nonavian reptiles and the structure of the ancestral amniote genome.

Authors:  Andrew M Shedlock; Christopher W Botka; Shaying Zhao; Jyoti Shetty; Tingting Zhang; Jun S Liu; Patrick J Deschavanne; Scott V Edwards
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The neoselectionist theory of genome evolution.

Authors:  Giorgio Bernardi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  cDNA-based gene mapping and GC3 profiling in the soft-shelled turtle suggest a chromosomal size-dependent GC bias shared by sauropsids.

Authors:  Shigehiro Kuraku; Junko Ishijima; Chizuko Nishida-Umehara; Kiyokazu Agata; Shigeru Kuratani; Yoichi Matsuda
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  The Anolis lizard genome: an amniote genome without isochores.

Authors:  Matthew K Fujita; Scott V Edwards; Chris P Ponting
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.416

6.  Phylogenetic distribution of large-scale genome patchiness.

Authors:  José L Oliver; Pedro Bernaola-Galván; Michael Hackenberg; Pedro Carpena
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 3.260

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.