Literature DB >> 12354241

Assessing health professionals.

Jim Crossley1, Gerry Humphris, Brian Jolly.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Good professional regulation depends on high quality procedures for assessing professional performance. Professional assessment can also have a powerful educational impact by providing transparent performance criteria and returning structured formative feedback. AIM: This paper sets out to define some of the fundamental principles of good assessment design.
CONCLUSIONS: It is essential to clarify the purpose of the assessment in question because this drives every aspect of its design. The intended focus for the assessment should be defined as specifically as possible. The scope of situations over which the result is intended to generalize should be established. Blueprinting may help the test designer to select a representative sample of practice across all the relevant aspects of performance and may also be used to inform the selection of appropriate assessment methods. An appropriately designed pilot study enables the test designer to evaluate feasibility, acceptability, validity (with respect to the intended focus) and reliability (with respect to the intended scope of generalization).

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12354241     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01294.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  27 in total

Review 1.  How reliable are assessments of clinical teaching? A review of the published instruments.

Authors:  Thomas J Beckman; Amit K Ghosh; David A Cook; Patricia J Erwin; Jayawant N Mandrekar
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Developing assessment: involving the sessional clinical teacher.

Authors:  H Bateman; J M Thomason; G McCracken; J Ellis
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 3.  What is the validity evidence for assessments of clinical teaching?

Authors:  Thomas J Beckman; David A Cook; Jayawant N Mandrekar
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Educational testing and validity of conclusions in the scholarship of teaching and learning.

Authors:  Michael J Peeters; Svetlana A Beltyukova; Beth A Martin
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 5.  Portfolio: a comprehensive method of assessment for postgraduates in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Poornima Kadagad; S M Kotrashetti
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-05-12

6.  Validation of a Canadian curriculum in obstetric medicine.

Authors:  Annabelle Cumyn; Paul Gibson
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2010-12-03

7.  The Overseas Registration Examination of the General Dental Council.

Authors:  V Bissell; S Chamberlain; E Davenport; L Dawson; S Jenkins; R Murphy
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 1.626

8.  Academia and accountability: the importance of role modeling.

Authors:  Abdulsalam A Al-Sulaiman
Journal:  J Family Community Med       Date:  2004-01

9.  Changes in postgraduate medical education and training in clinical radiology.

Authors:  D Lindsell
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2008-01-01

10.  Simulation-a new educational paradigm?

Authors:  Mojca Konia; Aubrey Yao
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2013-02-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.