Literature DB >> 12353753

The relationship between conspecific fertilization success and reproductive isolation among three congeneric sea urchins.

Don R Levitan1.   

Abstract

Few data are available on the effectiveness of reproductive isolating mechanisms in externally fertilizing taxa. I investigated patterns of conspecific and heterospecific fertilization among three coexisting sea urchin species, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis, S.franciscanus, and S. purpuratus. In the laboratory, both among and within species, eggs from individual females whose eggs are more easily fertilized by conspecific sperm are also most susceptible to heterospecific fertilization. At one extreme, S. droebachiensis requires an order of magnitude fewer conspecific sperm to fertilize eggs than do the other two species and shows very little distinction between conspecific and heterospecific sperm in no choice experiments. Strongylocentrotus franciscanus has an intermediate susceptibility to fertilization by heterospecific sperm. At the other extreme, S. purpuratus rarely cross-fertilizes. Field observations indicate that S. droebachiensis is often surrounded by heterospecific sea urchins. Genetic analysis of larvae produced during heterospecific spawning events indicate that hybrids are generally produced if male conspecifics are more than 1 m from a spawning female S. droebachiensis. Laboratory cultures indicate that these hybrids suffer high mortality relative to conspecific larvae. Comparisons of reproductive success of S. droebachiensis during single-species and multispecies spawning events indicate that the benefits of producing easily fertilized eggs under conditions of sperm limitation may outweigh the costs of losing some offspring to hybrid fertilization. Patterns of variability in heterospecific fertilization are considered in light of three hypotheses: phylogenetic relatedness, reinforcement selection, and sexual selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12353753     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01472.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  7 in total

1.  Evolutionary animation: how do molecular phylogenies compare to Mayr's reconstruction of speciation patterns in the sea?

Authors:  Stephen R Palumbi; H A Lessios
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Weak prezygotic isolating mechanisms in threatened Caribbean Acropora corals.

Authors:  Nicole D Fogarty; Steven V Vollmer; Don R Levitan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Reticulate evolution and marine organisms: the final frontier?

Authors:  Michael L Arnold; Nicole D Fogarty
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 6.208

4.  No evidence of conpopulation sperm precedence between allopatric populations of house mice.

Authors:  Renée C Firman; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Interspecific gamete compatibility and hybrid larval fitness in reef-building corals: Implications for coral reef restoration.

Authors:  Wing Yan Chan; Lesa M Peplow; Madeleine J H van Oppen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The Molecular Mechanisms of Gametic Incompatibility in Invertebrates.

Authors:  A A Lobov; A L Maltseva; N A Mikhailova; A I Granovitch
Journal:  Acta Naturae       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.845

7.  Individual variability in reproductive success determines winners and losers under ocean acidification: a case study with sea urchins.

Authors:  Peter Schlegel; Jon N Havenhand; Michael R Gillings; Jane E Williamson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.