Literature DB >> 12352390

Renal intrapelvic pressure during percutaneous nephrolithotomy and its correlation with the development of postoperative fever.

Scott A Troxel1, Roger K Low.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Systemic absorption of irrigation fluid containing bacteria or endotoxin may lead to fever and urosepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Although to our knowledge the exact method of absorption is undefined, intrapelvic pressure greater than 30 mm. Hg has been shown to result in pyelovenous-lymphatic backflow. We measured intrapelvic pressure during percutaneous nephrolithotomy and correlated pressure with postoperative fever and operative technique.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intrarenal pressure was measured with a transurethral 7Fr ureteral occlusion balloon catheter and a urodynamic system during percutaneous renal access, rigid and flexible nephroscopy, and intracorporeal lithotripsy. Postoperative fever was correlated with elevated intrarenal pressure, stone type and surgical technique.
RESULTS: Enrolled in this study were 18 women and 13 men. Pressure greater than 30 mm. Hg was recorded in 8 patients (26%). Elevated pressure occurred under 2 conditions, namely incomplete positioning of the nephroscopy sheath within the collecting system and endoscopy through a narrow infundibulum. In 13 cases (42%) a fever of 38C or greater developed postoperatively. Elevated pressure did not correlate with fever. However, of those undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the removal of infection versus noninfection stones 64% and 24%, respectively, had fever postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: Renal intrapelvic pressure generally remains low during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Elevated pressure was associated with incomplete nephroscopy sheath positioning within the collecting system and endoscopy through an infundibular narrowing. There was no association of renal pressure greater than 30 mm. Hg with fever but postoperative fever and percutaneous nephrolithotomy done for infection related stones correlated significantly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12352390     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000030996.64339.f1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  31 in total

Review 1.  Risk factors for sepsis after percutaneous renal stone surgery.

Authors:  Evgeniy I Kreydin; Brian H Eisner
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Comparison of the clinical efficacy and safety of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy and ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of obstructive upper ureteral calculi with concurrent urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Jun-Tao Jiang; Wei-Guo Li; Yi-Ping Zhu; Wen-Lan Sun; Wei Zhao; Yuan Ruan; Chen Zhong; Kristofer Wood; Hai-Bin Wei; Shu-Jie Xia; Xiao-Wen Sun
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Chien-Hsing Chang; Chung-Jing Wang; Shi-Wei Huang
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-02-18

4.  Risk factors for postoperative infectious complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Omer Koras; Ibrahim Halil Bozkurt; Tarik Yonguc; Tansu Degirmenci; Burak Arslan; Bulent Gunlusoy; Ozgu Aydogdu; Suleyman Minareci
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Flow matters 2: How to improve irrigation flow in small-calibre percutaneous procedures-the purging effect.

Authors:  Udo Nagele; Ute Walcher; Markus Bader; Thomas Herrmann; Stephan Kruck; David Schilling
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  The vacuum cleaner effect in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy.

Authors:  André P Nicklas; David Schilling; Markus J Bader; Thomas R W Herrmann; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Risk factors for sepsis in patients with struvite stones following percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Xiaomin Gao; Chaoyue Lu; Fei Xie; Ling Li; Min Liu; Ziyu Fang; Zeyu Wang; Shaoxiong Ming; Hao Dong; Rong Shen; Yinghao Sun; Yonghan Peng; Xiaofeng Gao
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Pressure matters 2: intrarenal pressure ranges during upper-tract endourological procedures.

Authors:  Theodoros Tokas; Andreas Skolarikos; Thomas R W Herrmann; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Comparison of intrarenal pelvic pressure during micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Abdulkadir Tepeler; Tolga Akman; Mesrur Selcuk Silay; Muzaffer Akcay; Cevper Ersoz; Senad Kalkan; Abdullah Armagan; Kemal Sarica
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Infective complications after retrograde intrarenal surgery: a new standardized classification system.

Authors:  Francesco Berardinelli; Piergustavo De Francesco; Michele Marchioni; Nicoletta Cera; Silvia Proietti; Derek Hennessey; Orietta Dalpiaz; Cecilia Cracco; Cesare Scoffone; Luigi Schips; Guido Giusti; Luca Cindolo
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.