Literature DB >> 12352381

Percutaneous cystolithotomy in the pediatric augmented bladder.

Mark P Cain1, Anthony J Casale, Martin Kaefer, Elizabeth Yerkes, Richard C Rink.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Bladder stones are a common problem following augmentation cystoplasty. With the addition of Mitrofanoff channels for intermittent catheterization and more aggressive bladder neck tightening procedures, the incidence of stones has increased and endoscopic access to the bladder has become more complicated. We present our results of percutaneous endoscopic cystolithotomy in children with bladder augmentation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed percutaneous extraction of bladder calculi in 13 children with bladder augmentation. All patients performed catheterization either via a Mitrofanoff channel, artificial urinary sphincter or plicated ileal limb of an ileocecal reservoir. The prior suprapubic tube site was dilated with an Amplatz set for access, and stones were removed intact or fragmented by laser or electrohydraulic lithotripsy.
RESULTS: Percutaneous extraction was successful in 12 of the 13 patients (92%). The remaining patient had a small posterior bladder perforation and open cystolithotomy was performed. All patients were discharged home in 24 to 36 hours, and there have been no stone recurrences with a mean followup of 24 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous stone removal using the previous suprapubic tract is a simple, effective and minimally invasive option for removing stones in an augmented bladder. This technique avoids potential injury to the continence mechanism of the reconstructed bladder neck or Mitrofanoff channel. Percutaneous stone removal has become our procedure of choice for managing calculi in the augmented bladder.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12352381     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000023529.61701.ce

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

1.  Bladder augmentation with an omental pedicled gastric seromuscular flap without the necessity of gastric resection.

Authors:  Adnan Aslan; Bahar Akkaya; Güngör Karagüzel; Gülten Karpuzoglu; Mustafa Melikoglu
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2004-04-21

Review 2.  Surgical management of urolithiasis in spinal cord injury patients.

Authors:  Philippe Nabbout; Gennady Slobodov; Daniel J Culkin
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Percutaneous treatment of bladder stones in children: 10 years experience, is blind access safe?

Authors:  Hassan Ahmadnia; Ali Kamalati; Mehdi Younesi; Mohammad Mehdi Imani; Mahmoodreza Moradi; Mohammad Esmaeili
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Comparison of three different endoscopic techniques in management of bladder calculi.

Authors:  Kamal Jeet Singh; Jaspreet Kaur
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2011-01

5.  Concurrent stone stabilization improves ultrasonic and pneumatic efficacy during cystolithopaxy: an in vitro analysis.

Authors:  Shubha De; Carl Sarkissian; Giovanni Marchinni; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

6.  Large bladder stone as a complication of AUS insertion and bladder augmentation.

Authors:  Seyedehpariya Saadat; David Winkle; Jodi Hirst
Journal:  Urol Case Rep       Date:  2018-05-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.