Literature DB >> 12352153

Utility of behavioral changes as markers of sexually transmitted disease risk reduction in sexually transmitted disease/HIV prevention trials.

Steven David Pinkerton1, Harrell Warren Chesson, Peter Mark Layde.   

Abstract

Most sexually transmitted disease (STD)/HIV sexual risk reduction intervention trials are evaluated using behavioral outcomes as their main indicators of intervention effectiveness. How good are behavioral measures as surrogate markers for STD infection? Do the behavioral changes that are commonly assessed in risk reduction interventions accurately reflect changes in STD risk? We applied a mathematical model of STD/HIV transmission to empiric data from a large HIV prevention intervention to estimate pre- to postintervention changes in intervention participants' STD risk. We then used the coefficient of determination (R(2)) to assess the strength of association between changes in STD risk and changes in three behavioral measures: proportion of acts of intercourse for which condoms were used, number of sex partners, and number of acts of unprotected intercourse. The results indicate that change in the number of acts of unprotected intercourse is a superior marker of STD risk changes for less infectious STDs such as HIV, whereas change in the number of partners may be preferable for highly infectious STDs such as gonorrhea. Changes in the proportion of acts of intercourse for which condoms were used were not strongly correlated with changes in STD risk under most of the conditions examined in this analysis. The utility of different measures of sexual behavior change as markers for changes in STD risk and, hence, expected incidence, depends on the infectivity and prevalence of the target STD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12352153     DOI: 10.1097/00126334-200209010-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr        ISSN: 1525-4135            Impact factor:   3.731


  14 in total

Review 1.  Surveillance and modelling of HIV, STI, and risk behaviours in concentrated HIV epidemics.

Authors:  S Mills; T Saidel; R Magnani; T Brown
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  On models for binomial data with random numbers of trials.

Authors:  W Scott Comulada; Robert E Weiss
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Contextual correlates of per partner unprotected anal intercourse rates among MSM in Soweto, South Africa.

Authors:  Michael P Arnold; Helen Struthers; James McIntyre; Tim Lane
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2013-05

4.  Linearity and nonlinearity in HIV/STI transmission: implications for the evaluation of sexual risk reduction interventions.

Authors:  Steven D Pinkerton; Harrell W Chesson; Richard A Crosby; Peter M Layde
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  2011-12-27

5.  Case-crossover analysis of condom use and herpes simplex virus type 2 acquisition.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Stanaway; Anna Wald; Emily T Martin; Sami L Gottlieb; Amalia S Magaret
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  Effect of risk-reduction counseling with rapid HIV testing on risk of acquiring sexually transmitted infections: the AWARE randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Lisa R Metsch; Daniel J Feaster; Lauren Gooden; Bruce R Schackman; Tim Matheson; Moupali Das; Matthew R Golden; Shannon Huffaker; Louise F Haynes; Susan Tross; C Kevin Malotte; Antoine Douaihy; P Todd Korthuis; Wayne A Duffus; Sarah Henn; Robert Bolan; Susan S Philip; Jose G Castro; Pedro C Castellon; Gayle McLaughlin; Raul N Mandler; Bernard Branson; Grant N Colfax
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Aggregate versus individual-level sexual behavior assessment: how much detail is needed to accurately estimate HIV/STI risk?

Authors:  Steven D Pinkerton; Carol L Galletly; Timothy L McAuliffe; Wayne DiFranceisco; H Fisher Raymond; Harrell W Chesson
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  2010-02

8.  Religiosity and sexual risk behaviors among African American cocaine users in the rural South.

Authors:  Brooke E E Montgomery; Katharine E Stewart; Karen H K Yeary; Carol E Cornell; LeaVonne Pulley; Robert Corwyn; Songthip T Ounpraseuth
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Sexual risk reduction interventions do not inadvertently increase the overall frequency of sexual behavior: a meta-analysis of 174 studies with 116,735 participants.

Authors:  Natalie D Smoak; Lori A J Scott-Sheldon; Blair T Johnson; Michael P Carey
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 10.  HIV prevention interventions to reduce racial disparities in the United States: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vagish Hemmige; Rachel McFadden; Scott Cook; Hui Tang; John A Schneider
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.