OBJECTIVE: Patients with acute lung injury after smoke inhalation often develop pneumonia subsequently complicated by sepsis. This often is a fatal complication. The aim of this study was to develop a standardized and reproducible model of hyperdynamic sepsis after smoke inhalation in sheep. DESIGN: Prospective, experimental study in sheep. SETTINGS: Experimental laboratory in a university hospital. SUBJECTS: Twenty-one female Merino ewes. INTERVENTION: Animals were anesthetized and surgically prepared for this chronic study. After a week of recovery, baseline data were collected. After tracheostomy was performed, sheep were connected to a volume-controlled ventilator. Acute lung injury was produced by insufflating the lungs with 48 breaths of cotton smoke. During halothane anesthesia, live bacteria suspended in a 30-mL saline solution containing 2-5 x 10(11) colony-forming units were instilled through a bronchoscope into the right lower and middle lung lobes (10 mL each) and left lower lung lobe (10 mL; n = 10). Eleven sheep were given smoke but not bacteria. After injury and the bacterial challenge, the animals were ventilated mechanically with 100% oxygen. The animals were monitored for 48 hrs. was detected in blood cultures after 14-48 hrs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The sheep developed a hyperkinetic cardiovascular response concomitant with a decrease in Pao similar to severe sepsis in human patients who meet the criteria for acute respiratory distress syndrome (PaO2 /FIO2 <200). These changes were more severe than in animals exposed to smoke inhalation alone. Mean arterial pressures at 48 hrs in the smoke-alone and the smoke + sepsis group were 85.5 +/- 5.2 and 68.1 +/- 7.6 mm Hg, respectively (mean +/- se, p<.05). CONCLUSION: This animal model closely resembles hyperdynamic sepsis in humans and may be of great value for studies of sepsis with smoke inhalation.
OBJECTIVE:Patients with acute lung injury after smoke inhalation often develop pneumonia subsequently complicated by sepsis. This often is a fatal complication. The aim of this study was to develop a standardized and reproducible model of hyperdynamic sepsis after smoke inhalation in sheep. DESIGN: Prospective, experimental study in sheep. SETTINGS: Experimental laboratory in a university hospital. SUBJECTS: Twenty-one female Merino ewes. INTERVENTION: Animals were anesthetized and surgically prepared for this chronic study. After a week of recovery, baseline data were collected. After tracheostomy was performed, sheep were connected to a volume-controlled ventilator. Acute lung injury was produced by insufflating the lungs with 48 breaths of cotton smoke. During halothane anesthesia, live bacteria suspended in a 30-mL saline solution containing 2-5 x 10(11) colony-forming units were instilled through a bronchoscope into the right lower and middle lung lobes (10 mL each) and left lower lung lobe (10 mL; n = 10). Eleven sheep were given smoke but not bacteria. After injury and the bacterial challenge, the animals were ventilated mechanically with 100% oxygen. The animals were monitored for 48 hrs. was detected in blood cultures after 14-48 hrs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The sheep developed a hyperkinetic cardiovascular response concomitant with a decrease in Pao similar to severe sepsis in humanpatients who meet the criteria for acute respiratory distress syndrome (PaO2 /FIO2 <200). These changes were more severe than in animals exposed to smoke inhalation alone. Mean arterial pressures at 48 hrs in the smoke-alone and the smoke + sepsis group were 85.5 +/- 5.2 and 68.1 +/- 7.6 mm Hg, respectively (mean +/- se, p<.05). CONCLUSION: This animal model closely resembles hyperdynamic sepsis in humans and may be of great value for studies of sepsis with smoke inhalation.
Authors: Matthias Lange; Atsumori Hamahata; Daniel L Traber; Rhykka Connelly; Yoshimitsu Nakano; Lillian D Traber; Frank C Schmalstieg; David N Herndon; Perenlei Enkhbaatar Journal: Burns Date: 2012-05-29 Impact factor: 2.744
Authors: Matthias Lange; Csaba Szabo; Daniel L Traber; Eszter Horvath; Atsumori Hamahata; Yoshimitsu Nakano; Lillian D Traber; Robert A Cox; Frank C Schmalstieg; David N Herndon; Perenlei Enkhbaatar Journal: Shock Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Audrey C Bergeron; Brittany G Seman; John H Hammond; Linda S Archambault; Deborah A Hogan; Robert T Wheeler Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2017-10-18 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Dirk M Maybauer; Marc O Maybauer; Csaba Szabó; Martin Westphal; Lillian D Traber; Andrew L Salzman; David N Herndon; Daniel L Traber Journal: Burns Date: 2011-02-22 Impact factor: 2.744
Authors: Dirk M Maybauer; Marc O Maybauer; Csaba Szabó; Robert A Cox; Martin Westphal; Levente Kiss; Eszter M Horvath; Lillian D Traber; Hal K Hawkins; Andrew L Salzman; Garry J Southan; David N Herndon; Daniel L Traber Journal: Shock Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Yoshimitsu Nakano; Marc O Maybauer; Dirk M Maybauer; Perenlei Enkhbaatar; Daniel L Traber Journal: Burns Date: 2010-04-14 Impact factor: 2.744
Authors: Matthias Lange; Rhykka Connelly; Daniel L Traber; Atsumori Hamahata; Robert A Cox; Yoshimitsu Nakano; Kamna Bansal; Aimalohi Esechie; Sanna von Borzyskowski; Collette Jonkam; Lillian D Traber; Hal K Hawkins; David N Herndon; Perenlei Enkhbaatar Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Matthias Lange; Rhykka Connelly; Daniel L Traber; Atsumori Hamahata; Yoshimitsu Nakano; Aimalohi Esechie; Collette Jonkam; Sanna von Borzyskowski; Lillian D Traber; Frank C Schmalstieg; David N Herndon; Perenlei Enkhbaatar Journal: Crit Care Date: 2010-07-05 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Collette C Jonkam; Kamna Bansal; Daniel L Traber; Atsumori Hamahata; Marc O Maybauer; Dirk M Maybauer; Robert A Cox; Matthias Lange; Rhykka L Connelly; Lillian D Traber; Clarisse D Djukom; John R Salsbury; David N Herndon; Perenlei Enkhbaatar Journal: Crit Care Date: 2009-02-17 Impact factor: 9.097