Literature DB >> 12351870

Vapor diffusion, nucleation rates and the reservoir to crystallization volume ratio.

Elizabeth L Forsythe1, Daniel L Maxwell, Marc Pusey.   

Abstract

In a classical vapor diffusion crystallization, the protein solution is mixed in a 1:1 ratio with the reservoir solution, containing one or more precipitant species, after which the two are placed in an enclosed chamber. As the vapor pressure is lower for the reservoir solution, due to its higher solute concentration, there is a net transfer of water through the vapor phase from the protein droplet to the reservoir. In theory, the initial conditions in the droplet are such that the protein is in either a metastable or undersaturated state with respect to crystal nucleation. The loss of water serves to both concentrate the protein and the precipitant concentrations within the drop, bringing the protein past the metastable point to nucleation. The equilibration rate is a function of the precipitant(s) used, their concentration, the temperature, the distance between the two surfaces, and the droplet to reservoir volume ratio. For a given reservoir volume smaller droplets equilibrate faster, the rate being inversely linear with the droplet volume. In attempts to maximize the number of crystallization trials, and as crystals in the 100 - 200 micro m size range are sufficient, it has currently become standard practice to use starting droplet volumes of 2 - 4 micro l, with reservoir volumes typically in the 200 to 500 micro l range. The equilibration rates are maximized, and for most common salt concentrations and higher concentrations of polyethylene glycol (PEG) and 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol (MPD) one can reasonably estimate that equilibration has occurred within 3 to 6 days at room temperature. Crystals appearing after this time are essentially grown under batch conditions. We experimentally find that altering the reservoir to droplet volume ratio, by changing the reservoir volume, from 50:1 (high ratio) to 5:1 (low ratio), on average increases the equilibration time by approximately 50 % when tested with solutions of 50% MPD, 1.5 M NaCl, or 30 % PEG 400. However, experiments with two proteins, chicken egg white lysozyme and concanavalin a, showed an unexpected trend of slightly faster nucleation and larger crystals in the lowest ratio experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12351870     DOI: 10.1107/s0907444902014208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr        ISSN: 0907-4449


  8 in total

Review 1.  High-throughput protein purification and quality assessment for crystallization.

Authors:  Youngchang Kim; Gyorgy Babnigg; Robert Jedrzejczak; William H Eschenfeldt; Hui Li; Natalia Maltseva; Catherine Hatzos-Skintges; Minyi Gu; Magdalena Makowska-Grzyska; Ruiying Wu; Hao An; Gekleng Chhor; Andrzej Joachimiak
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  Pi sampling: a methodical and flexible approach to initial macromolecular crystallization screening.

Authors:  Fabrice Gorrec; Colin M Palmer; Guillaume Lebon; Tony Warne
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2011-04-07

3.  Monitoring and scoring counter-diffusion protein crystallization experiments in capillaries by in situ dynamic light scattering.

Authors:  Dominik Oberthuer; Emilio Melero-García; Karsten Dierks; Arne Meyer; Christian Betzel; Alfonso Garcia-Caballero; Jose A Gavira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The MORPHEUS II protein crystallization screen.

Authors:  Fabrice Gorrec
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 1.056

5.  Lessons from ten years of crystallization experiments at the SGC.

Authors:  Jia Tsing Ng; Carien Dekker; Paul Reardon; Frank von Delft
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 7.652

6.  Iterative screen optimization maximizes the efficiency of macromolecular crystallization.

Authors:  Harrison G Jones; Daniel Wrapp; Morgan S A Gilman; Michael B Battles; Nianshuang Wang; Sofia Sacerdote; Gwo Yu Chuang; Peter D Kwong; Jason S McLellan
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 1.056

7.  Applications of the second virial coefficient: protein crystallization and solubility.

Authors:  William W Wilson; Lawrence J Delucas
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 1.056

8.  Successful sample preparation for serial crystallography experiments.

Authors:  John H Beale; Rachel Bolton; Stephen A Marshall; Emma V Beale; Stephen B Carr; Ali Ebrahim; Tadeo Moreno-Chicano; Michael A Hough; Jonathan A R Worrall; Ivo Tews; Robin L Owen
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.304

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.