Literature DB >> 12351593

Organ preservation therapy using induction plus concurrent chemoradiation for advanced resectable oropharyngeal carcinoma: a University of Pennsylvania Phase II Trial.

Mitchell Machtay1, David I Rosenthal, Diane Hershock, Heather Jones, Shirnett Williamson, Michael J Greenberg, Gregory S Weinstein, Victor M Aviles, Ara A Chalian, Randal S Weber.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy, feasibility, and toxicity of a new regimen for locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients had technically resectable stage III/IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, exclusive of T1-2N1. Induction chemotherapy consisted of carboplatin (area under the curve formula equal to 6) and paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) for two cycles, followed by re-evaluation. Patients with major response continued to definitive radiotherapy (70 Gy over 7 weeks) plus concurrent once-weekly paclitaxel (30 mg/m(2)/wk). Patients with advanced neck disease also underwent post-radiation therapy neck dissection and two more chemotherapy cycles.
RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 31 months (minimum follow-up for survivors was 18 months). The major response rate to induction chemotherapy was 89%; 90% of patients had a complete response after concurrent chemoradiation. Actuarial survival at 3 years was 70%, and 3-year event-free survival was 59%. The 3-year actuarial locoregional control was 82% and the 3-year actuarial rate of distant metastases was 19%. Organ preservation was achieved in 77% of all patients. One patient (2%) died during therapy. Late grade 3 toxicity occurred in 24% of patients, consisting mainly of chronic dysphagia/aspiration and/or radiation soft tissue ulceration. The treatment-related mortality rate was 4% (two patients died from respiratory failure).
CONCLUSION: Response to induction chemotherapy as studied in this trial was not useful as a predictive marker for ultimate outcome or organ conservation. Overall, however, this regimen offers good disease control and survival for patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma, comparable with other concurrent chemoradiation programs. Further study of similar protocols is indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12351593     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.11.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  41 in total

1.  Oncologic and functional results after transoral laser microsurgery of tongue base carcinoma.

Authors:  Martin Canis; Friedrich Ihler; Hendrik A Wolff; Hans Christiansen; Christoph Matthias; Wolfgang Steiner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Organ sparing and clinical outcome with step-and-shoot IMRT for head and neck cancer: a mono-institutional experience.

Authors:  Rosario Mazzola; Giuseppe Ferrera; Filippo Alongi; Mariella Mannino; Boris Abbate; Teresa Cucchiara; Giuseppina Iacoviello; Francesco Sciumè; Gioacchino Di Paola; Manuela Federico; Livio Blasi; Antonio Lo Casto; Roberto Lagalla; Domenico Messana
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Presence of malignant tumor cells in persistent neck disease after radiotherapy for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx is associated with poor survival.

Authors:  Christian Simon; Helmuth Goepfert; David I Rosenthal; Dianna Roberts; Adel El-Naggar; Matthew Old; Eduardo M Diaz; Jeffrey N Myers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Organ preservation in locally advanced head and neck cancer of the larynx using induction chemotherapy followed by improved radiation schemes.

Authors:  Giovanni Franchin; Emanuela Vaccher; Doriano Politi; Emilio Minatel; Carlo Gobitti; Renato Talamini; Simon Spazzapan; Maria Gabriella Savignano; Mauro G Trovò; Luigi Barzan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  When is definitive radiotherapy the preferred treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma?

Authors:  William M Mendenhall; Primož Strojan; Avraham Eisbruch; Robert Smee; Alessandra Rinaldo; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy compared with definitive conventional radiotherapy in cervical oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Caineng Cao; Jingwei Luo; Li Gao; Guozhen Xu; Junlin Yi; Xiaodong Huang; Kai Wang; Shiping Zhang; Yuan Qu; Suyan Li; Jianping Xiao; Zhong Zhang
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Long-term functional and oncologic results of transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Eric J Moore; Steven M Olsen; Rebecca R Laborde; Joaquín J García; Francis J Walsh; Daniel L Price; Jeffrey R Janus; Jan L Kasperbauer; Kerry D Olsen
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 7.616

8.  Aspiration in head and neck cancer patients: a single centre experience of clinical profile, bacterial isolates and antibiotic sensitivity pattern.

Authors:  K C Lakshmaiah; Nagesh T Sirsath; Jayshree R Subramanyam; Babu K Govind; D Lokanatha; Ashok M Shenoy
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-03-20

Review 9.  Induction chemotherapy for squamous cancer of the head and neck.

Authors:  Merrill S Kies
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  Standard chemoradiation versus intensity-modulated chemoradiation: a quality of life assessment in oropharyngeal cancer patients.

Authors:  Sarah E Mowry; Christopher Tang; Ahmad Sadeghi; Marilene B Wang
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.