Literature DB >> 12351302

A comparison of the laryngeal tube with the laryngeal mask airway during routine surgical procedures.

Hartmut Ocker1, Volker Wenzel, Peter Schmucker, Markus Steinfath, Volker Dörges.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The laryngeal mask airway (LMA; Laryngeal Mask Company, Henley-on-Thames, UK) is an established airway device, whereas the laryngeal tube (LT) is relatively new and therefore not as well investigated. Therefore, the purpose of the present prospective, randomized, controlled trial was to compare the LT with the LMA in routine clinical practice. In 50 patients undergoing general anesthesia for minor routine surgery, standardized anesthesia was induced and maintained with alfentanil and propofol. Patients were randomized to controlled ventilation (fraction of inspired oxygen = 0.4; fraction of inspired nitrous oxide = 0.6; tidal volume = 7 mL/kg; respiratory rate = 10 breaths/min) with the LT (n = 25) or the LMA (n = 25). Oxygen saturation was recorded before the induction of anesthesia and after the administration of oxygen. After 2 and 10 min of ventilation with the LT or LMA, oxygen saturation, end-expiratory carbon dioxide, expiratory tidal volume, and peak airway pressure were recorded. Capillary blood gas samples were taken before the induction of anesthesia and after 10 min of ventilation. Time of insertion and airway leak pressure of each device were measured. The time of insertion was comparable with both devices (LT versus LMA, median 21 s versus 19 s; P = not significant). Blood gas samples and ventilation variables revealed sufficient ventilation and oxygenation with either device (P = not significant). Peak airway pressure (LT, 17 +/- 3 cm H(2)O; LMA, 15 +/- 3 cm H(2)O) and airway leak pressure (LT, 36 +/- 3 cm H(2)O; LMA, 22 +/- 3 cm H(2)O) were significantly (P < 0.05) higher when using the LT compared with the LMA. In conclusion, using the LT and LMA resulted in comparable ventilation and oxygenation variables in this model of ASA physical status I and II patients undergoing routine surgical procedures. The newly developed LT may be a simple alternative device to secure the airway. IMPLICATIONS: The laryngeal tube, a newly developed airway device, and the laryngeal mask airway were used to ventilate patients in the operating room. Both airway devices proved to be effective and safe; however, the laryngeal tube allowed greater airway pressure during ventilation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12351302     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200210000-00057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  13 in total

Review 1.  [Methods of airway management in prehospital emergency medicine].

Authors:  W Keul; M Bernhard; A Völkl; R Gust; A Gries
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  [Laryngeal masks. Possibilities and limits].

Authors:  H Hillebrand; J Motsch
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  [Taking over a patient with preclinical laryngeal tube].

Authors:  R Schalk
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 0.840

4.  Using a laryngeal tube during cardiac arrest reduces "no flow time" in a manikin study: a comparison between laryngeal tube and endotracheal tube.

Authors:  Christoph H R Wiese; Utz Bartels; Anna Bergmann; Ingo Bergmann; Jan Bahr; Bernhard M Graf
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.704

5.  Randomized evaluation of the size 2 laryngeal tube and classical laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions in children under positive pressure ventilation.

Authors:  Andreas Biedler; Marc Wrobel; Sven Schneider; Stefan Soltész; Stephan Ziegeler; Ulrich Grundmann
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Feasibility of written instructions in airway management training of laryngeal tube.

Authors:  Jouni Kurola; Heikki Paakkonen; Tapio Kettunen; Juha-Pekka Laakso; Jouko Gorski; Tom Silfvast
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  [Prehospital airway management of laryngeal tubes. Should the laryngeal tube S with gastric drain tube be preferred in emergency medicine?].

Authors:  V Dengler; P Wilde; C Byhahn; M G Mack; R Schalk
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 1.041

8.  [Laryngeal tube versus laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetised non-paralysed patientsA comparison of handling and postoperative morbidity].

Authors:  M Wrobel; U Grundmann; W Wilhelm; S Wagner; R Larsen
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  The new perilaryngeal airway (CobraPLA) is as efficient as the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) but provides better airway sealing pressures.

Authors:  Ozan Akça; Anupama Wadhwa; Papiya Sengupta; Jaleel Durrani; Keith Hanni; Mary Wenke; Yüksel Yücel; Rainer Lenhardt; Anthony G Doufas; Daniel I Sessler
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.627

10.  The CobraPLA during anesthesia with controlled ventilation: a clinical trial of efficacy.

Authors:  Sang Beom Nam; Yon Hee Shim; Min Soo Kim; Young Chul You; Youn-Woo Lee; Dong Woo Han; Jong Seok Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2006-12-31       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.