Literature DB >> 12350486

Prostate-specific antigen cutoff of 2.6 ng/mL for prostate cancer screening is associated with favorable pathologic tumor features.

Jason S Krumholtz1, Gustavo F Carvalhal, Christian G Ramos, Deborah S Smith, Phataraporn Thorson, Yan Yan, Peter A Humphrey, Kimberly A Roehl, William J Catalona.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the pathologic characteristics of clinical Stage T1c (nonpalpable, prostate-specific antigen [PSA]-detected) prostate cancers detected in the 2.6 to 4.0-ng/mL PSA range and compare them with Stage T1c cancers concurrently detected in the 4.1 to 10.0-ng/mL PSA range. All cancers were detected in a prostate cancer screening study.
METHODS: We studied 94 patients with clinical Stage T1c prostate cancer diagnosed by four or six-sector ultrasound-guided needle biopsy who underwent radical prostatectomy between June 1995 and December 1996. We included all men whose prostatectomy specimens were processed with complete embedding of all prostatic tissue. Of these, 42 had a PSA level of 2.6 to 4.0 ng/mL and 52 a PSA level 4.1 to 10.0 ng/mL at the time of cancer detection. We determined the tumor volume by complete embedding and grid morphometry, pathologic stage, Gleason sum, and surgical margin status and compared the cancer volume and pathologic tumor stages for each group.
RESULTS: Men with cancer detected at the 2.6 to 4.0 ng/mL PSA range had significantly smaller cancer volumes (1.1 +/- 1.1 cm(3) versus 1.8 +/- 1.5 cm(3), P = 0.02); however, no difference was found in the proportion (11.9% versus 11.5%, P = 0.9, and 23.8% versus 26.9%, P = 0.7, respectively) of tumors that met previously published criteria of "clinically insignificant" (organ confined, less than 0.2 cm(3) tumor volume, Gleason sum 6 or less) or "clinically unimportant" (organ confined, less than 0.5 cm(3) tumor volume, and Gleason sum 6 or less) tumors. Using the lower PSA cutoff point resulted in the detection of a significantly higher percentage of organ-confined tumors (88% versus 63%, P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of a 2.6-ng/mL PSA threshold for screening resulted in the more frequent detection of small, organ-confined tumors without overdetecting possibly clinically insignificant ones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12350486     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01875-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  29 in total

1.  Optimizing prostate biopsy strategies for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

Review 2.  Prostate kallikrein markers in diagnosis, risk stratification and prognosis.

Authors:  David Ulmert; M Frank O'Brien; Anders S Bjartell; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Proteomic studies of urinary biomarkers for prostate, bladder and kidney cancers.

Authors:  Steven L Wood; Margaret A Knowles; Douglas Thompson; Peter J Selby; Rosamonde E Banks
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Determining optimal prostate-specific antigen thresholds to identify an increased 4-year risk of prostate cancer development: an analysis within the Veterans Affairs Health Care System.

Authors:  S Scott Sutton; E David Crawford; Judd W Moul; James W Hardin; Eric Kruep
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Seminal plasma as a diagnostic fluid for male reproductive system disorders.

Authors:  Andrei P Drabovich; Punit Saraon; Keith Jarvi; Eleftherios P Diamandis
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  The effects of cigarette smoking on prostate-specific antigen in two different age groups.

Authors:  Gokhan Koc; Korhan Akgul; Yuksel Yilmaz; Alper Dirik; Sitki Un
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 7.  Risk stratification in prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Monique J Roobol; Sigrid V Carlsson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Comparison of oncologic outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men diagnosed with prostate cancer with PSA levels below and above 4 ng/mL.

Authors:  Charles Dariane; Chloé Le Cossec; Sarah J Drouin; Benoit Wolff; Benjamin Granger; Pierre Mozer; Marc-Olivier Bitker; Shahrokh F Shariat; Olivier Cussenot; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Comparison of observed biochemical recurrence-free survival in patients with low PSA values undergoing radical prostatectomy and predictions of preoperative nomogram.

Authors:  Ryan K Berglund; Andrew J Stephenson; Angel M Cronin; Andrew J Vickers; James A Eastham; Eric A Klein; Bertrand D Guillonneau
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Characteristics and outcome of prostate cancer with PSA <4 ng/ml at diagnosis: a population-based study.

Authors:  M Bonet; A Merglen; G Fioretta; E Rapiti; I Neyroud-Caspar; R Zanetti; R Miralbell; C Bouchardy
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.405

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.