Literature DB >> 12350432

Comparison between the analysis of the loudness dependency of the auditory N1/P2 component with LORETA and dipole source analysis in the prediction of treatment response to the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram in major depression.

C Mulert1, G Juckel, H Augustin, U Hegerl.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The loudness dependency of the auditory evoked potentials (LDAEP) is used as an indicator of the central serotonergic system and predicts clinical response to serotonin agonists. So far, LDAEP has been typically investigated with dipole source analysis, because with this method the primary and secondary auditory cortex (with a high versus low serotonergic innervation) can be separated at least in parts.
METHODS: We have developed a new analysis procedure that uses an MRI probabilistic map of the primary auditory cortex in Talairach space and analyzed the current density in this region of interest with low resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA). LORETA is a tomographic localization method that calculates the current density distribution in Talairach space.
RESULTS: In a group of patients with major depression (n=15), this new method can predict the response to an selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (citalopram) at least to the same degree than the traditional dipole source analysis method (P=0.019 vs. P=0.028). The correlation of the improvement in the Hamilton Scale is significant with the LORETA-LDAEP-values (0.56; P=0.031) but not with the dipole source analysis LDAEP-values (0.43; P=0.11).
CONCLUSIONS: The new tomographic LDAEP analysis is a promising tool in the analysis of the central serotonergic system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12350432     DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00252-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  16 in total

1.  The loudness dependence of the auditory evoked potential (LDAEP) as a predictor of the response to escitalopram in patients with generalized anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Young-Min Park; Do-Won Kim; Sangrae Kim; Chang-Hwan Im; Seung-Hwan Lee
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Demonstrating test-retest reliability of electrophysiological measures for healthy adults in a multisite study of biomarkers of antidepressant treatment response.

Authors:  Craig E Tenke; Jürgen Kayser; Pia Pechtel; Christian A Webb; Daniel G Dillon; Franziska Goer; Laura Murray; Patricia Deldin; Benji T Kurian; Patrick J McGrath; Ramin Parsey; Madhukar Trivedi; Maurizio Fava; Myrna M Weissman; Melvin McInnis; Karen Abraham; Jorge E Alvarenga; Daniel M Alschuler; Crystal Cooper; Diego A Pizzagalli; Gerard E Bruder
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  General and comparative efficacy and effectiveness of antidepressants in the acute treatment of depressive disorders: a report by the WPA section of pharmacopsychiatry.

Authors:  Thomas C Baghai; Pierre Blier; David S Baldwin; Michael Bauer; Guy M Goodwin; Kostas N Fountoulakis; Siegfried Kasper; Brian E Leonard; Ulrik F Malt; Dan Stein; Marcio Versiani; Hans-Jürgen Möller
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.270

4.  [123I] ADAM brainstem binding correlates with the loudness dependence of auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Oliver Pogarell; Walter Koch; Nadine Schaaff; Gabriele Pöpperl; Christoph Mulert; Georg Juckel; Hans-Jürgen Möller; Ulrich Hegerl; Klaus Tatsch
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 5.270

5.  Electroencephalographic Biomarkers for Treatment Response Prediction in Major Depressive Illness: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Alik S Widge; M Taha Bilge; Rebecca Montana; Weilynn Chang; Carolyn I Rodriguez; Thilo Deckersbach; Linda L Carpenter; Ned H Kalin; Charles B Nemeroff
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 18.112

6.  The astroglial protein S100B and visually evoked event-related potentials before and after antidepressant treatment.

Authors:  Guenter Hetzel; Olaf Moeller; Stefan Evers; Andreas Erfurth; Gerald Ponath; Volker Arolt; Matthias Rothermundt
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-08-14       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Hemispatial PCA dissociates temporal from parietal ERP generator patterns: CSD components in healthy adults and depressed patients during a dichotic oddball task.

Authors:  Craig E Tenke; Jürgen Kayser; Stewart A Shankman; Carlye B Griggs; Paul Leite; Jonathan W Stewart; Gerard E Bruder
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 2.997

8.  Response prediction to antidepressants using scalp and source-localized loudness dependence of auditory evoked potential (LDAEP) slopes.

Authors:  Natalia Jaworska; Claude Blondeau; Pierre Tessier; Sandhaya Norris; Wendy Fusee; Pierre Blier; Verner Knott
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-01-27       Impact factor: 5.067

9.  Serotonergic dysfunction in patients with bipolar disorder assessed by the loudness dependence of the auditory evoked potential.

Authors:  Kyung-Sang Lee; Young-Min Park; Seung-Hwan Lee
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.505

Review 10.  Predictors, moderators, and mediators (correlates) of treatment outcome in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  George I Papakostas; Maurizio Fava
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.