Literature DB >> 12350246

Interaction between seasonal density-dependence structures and length of the seasons explain the geographical structure of the dynamics of voles in Hokkaido: an example of seasonal forcing.

Nils Chr Stenseth1, Marte O Kittilsen, Dag Ø Hjermann, Hildegunn Viljugrein, Takashi Saitoh.   

Abstract

The grey-sided vole (Clethrionomys rufocanus) is distributed over the entire island of Hokkaido, Japan, across which it exhibits multi-annual density cycles in only parts of the island (the north-eastern part); in the remaining part of the island, only seasonal density changes occur. Using annual sampling of 189 grey-sided vole populations, we deduced the geographical structure in their second-order density dependence. Building upon our earlier suggestion, we deduce the seasonal density-dependent structure for these populations. Strong direct and delayed density dependence is found to occur during winter, whereas no density dependence is seen during the summer period. The direct density dependence during winter may be seen as a result of food being limited during that season: the delayed density dependence during the winter is consistent with vole-specialized predators (e.g. the least weasel) responding to vole densities so as to have a negative effect on the net growth rate of voles in the following year. We conclude that the observed geographical structure of the population dynamics may be properly seen as a result of the length of the summer in interaction with the differential seasonal density-dependent structure. Altogether, this indicates that the geographical pattern in multi-annual density dynamics in the grey-sided vole may be a result of seasonal forcing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12350246      PMCID: PMC1691118          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  6 in total

1.  From arctic lemmings to adaptive dynamics: Charles Elton's legacy in population ecology.

Authors:  J Lindström; E Ranta; H Kokko; P Lundberg; V Kaitala
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2001-02

2.  Is the impact of environmental noise visible in the dynamics of age-structured populations?

Authors:  V Kaitala; E Ranta
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The irreducible uncertainty of the demography-environment interaction in ecology.

Authors:  Niclas Jonzén; Per Lundberg; Esa Ranta; Veijo Kaitala
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Dynamic effects of predators on cyclic voles: field experimentation and model extrapolation.

Authors:  Erkki Korpimäki; Kai Norrdahl; Tero Klemola; Terje Pettersen; Nils Chr Stenseth
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  A gradient from stable to cyclic populations of Clethrionomys rufocanus in Hokkaido, Japan.

Authors:  N C Stenseth; O N Bjørnstad; T Saitoh
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1996-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  A geographic gradient in small rodent density fluctuations: a statistical modelling approach.

Authors:  O N Bjørnstad; W Falck; N C Stenseth
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1995-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  Population dynamics of small mammals in semi-arid regions: a comparative study of demographic variability in two rodent species.

Authors:  Mauricio Lima; Nils Chr Stenseth; Herwig Leirs; Fabián M Jaksic
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Population dynamics of a South American rodent: seasonal structure interacting with climate, density dependence and predator effects.

Authors:  Mauricio Lima; Nils Chr Stenseth; Fabian M Jaksic
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Periodic travelling waves in cyclic populations: field studies and reaction-diffusion models.

Authors:  Jonathan A Sherratt; Matthew J Smith
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  How predation and landscape fragmentation affect vole population dynamics.

Authors:  Trine Dalkvist; Richard M Sibly; Chris J Topping
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.