BACKGROUND: Confirmation of a workplace drug test requires urinary methamphetamine (MAMP) and amphetamine (AMP) concentrations > or = 500 and 200 micro g/L, respectively, but cutoffs at half those values (250/100 micro g/L) have been proposed. We determined the urinary excretion of MAMP after oral ingestion and examined the effect of using lower cutoffs on detection of exposure. METHODS: Volunteers (n = 8) ingested four 10-mg doses of MAMP. HCl daily over 7 days, and five of them ingested four 20-mg doses 4 weeks later. After ingestion, the volunteers collected all urine specimens for 2 weeks. After solid-phase extraction, MAMP and AMP were measured by gas chromatography-positive chemical ionization mass spectrometry with dual silyl derivatization. RESULTS: MAMP and AMP were generally detected in the first or second void (0.7-11.3 h) collected after drug administration, with concentrations of 82-1827 and 12-180 micro g/L, respectively. Peak MAMP concentrations (1871-6004 micro g/L) after single doses occurred within 1.5-60 h. MAMP > or = 500 micro g/L was first detected in the first or second void (1-11 h) at 524-1871 micro g/L. Lowering the MAMP cutoff to 250 micro g/L changed the initial detection time little. AMP > or = 200 micro g/L was first detected in the 2nd-13th (7-20 h) post-administration voids. At a cutoff of 100 micro g/L, AMP was first confirmed in the second to eighth void (4-13 h). Reducing the cutoff to 250/100 micro g/L extended terminal MAMP detection by up to 24 h, increased total detection time by up to 34 h, and increased the total number of positive specimens by 48%. CONCLUSIONS: At the lower cutoff, initial detection times are earlier, detection windows are longer, and confirmation rates are increased. Elimination of the AMP requirement would increase detection rates and allow earlier detection.
BACKGROUND: Confirmation of a workplace drug test requires urinary methamphetamine (MAMP) and amphetamine (AMP) concentrations > or = 500 and 200 micro g/L, respectively, but cutoffs at half those values (250/100 micro g/L) have been proposed. We determined the urinary excretion of MAMP after oral ingestion and examined the effect of using lower cutoffs on detection of exposure. METHODS: Volunteers (n = 8) ingested four 10-mg doses of MAMP.HCl daily over 7 days, and five of them ingested four 20-mg doses 4 weeks later. After ingestion, the volunteers collected all urine specimens for 2 weeks. After solid-phase extraction, MAMP and AMP were measured by gas chromatography-positive chemical ionization mass spectrometry with dual silyl derivatization. RESULTS:MAMP and AMP were generally detected in the first or second void (0.7-11.3 h) collected after drug administration, with concentrations of 82-1827 and 12-180 micro g/L, respectively. Peak MAMP concentrations (1871-6004 micro g/L) after single doses occurred within 1.5-60 h. MAMP > or = 500 micro g/L was first detected in the first or second void (1-11 h) at 524-1871 micro g/L. Lowering the MAMP cutoff to 250 micro g/L changed the initial detection time little. AMP > or = 200 micro g/L was first detected in the 2nd-13th (7-20 h) post-administration voids. At a cutoff of 100 micro g/L, AMP was first confirmed in the second to eighth void (4-13 h). Reducing the cutoff to 250/100 micro g/L extended terminal MAMP detection by up to 24 h, increased total detection time by up to 34 h, and increased the total number of positive specimens by 48%. CONCLUSIONS: At the lower cutoff, initial detection times are earlier, detection windows are longer, and confirmation rates are increased. Elimination of the AMP requirement would increase detection rates and allow earlier detection.
Authors: Alex J Brewer; Christoph Ort; Caleb J Banta-Green; Jean-Daniel Berset; Jennifer A Field Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2012-07-17 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Allan J Barnes; Michael L Smith; Sherri L Kacinko; Eugene W Schwilke; Edward J Cone; Eric T Moolchan; Marilyn A Huestis Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2007-11-02 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Brian D Kiluk; Kathleen M Carroll; Amy Duhig; Daniel E Falk; Kyle Kampman; Shengan Lai; Raye Z Litten; David J McCann; Ivan D Montoya; Kenzie L Preston; Phil Skolnick; Constance Weisner; George Woody; Redonna Chandler; Michael J Detke; Kelly Dunn; Robert H Dworkin; Joanne Fertig; Jennifer Gewandter; F Gerard Moeller; Tatiana Ramey; Megan Ryan; Kenneth Silverman; Eric C Strain Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2015-11-21 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Caleb J Banta-Green; Jennifer A Field; Aurea C Chiaia; Daniel L Sudakin; Laura Power; Luc de Montigny Journal: Addiction Date: 2009-07-14 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Teresa R Gray; Tamsin Kelly; Linda L LaGasse; Lynne M Smith; Chris Derauf; William Haning; Penny Grant; Rizwan Shah; Amelia Arria; Arthur Strauss; Barry M Lester; Marilyn A Huestis Journal: Ther Drug Monit Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 3.681