Literature DB >> 12323099

Identifying and quantifying sources of variation in microarray data using high-density cDNA membrane arrays.

Kevin R Coombes1, W Edward Highsmith, Tammy A Krogmann, Keith A Baggerly, David N Stivers, Lynne V Abruzzo.   

Abstract

Microarray experiments involve many steps, including spotting cDNA, extracting RNA, labeling targets, hybridizing, scanning, and analyzing images. Each step introduces variability, confounding our ability to obtain accurate estimates of the biological differences between samples. We ran repeated experiments using high-density cDNA microarray membranes (Research Genetics Human GeneFilters Microarrays Version I) and 33P-labeled targets. Total RNA was extracted from a Burkitt lymphoma cell line (GA-10). We estimated the components of variation coming from: (1) image analysis, (2) exposure time to PhosphorImager screens, (3) differences in membranes, (4) reuse of membranes, and (5) differences in targets prepared from two independent RNA extractions. Variation was assessed qualitatively using a clustering algorithm and quantitatively using a version of ANOVA adapted to multivariate microarray data. The largest contribution to variation came from reusing membranes, which contributed 38% of the total variation. Differences in membranes and in exposure time each contributed about 10%. Differences in target preparations contributed less than 5%. The effect of image quantification was negligible. Much of the effect from reusing membranes was attributable to increasing levels of background radiation and can be reduced by using membranes at most four times. The effects of exposure time, which were partly attributable to variation in the scanning process, can be minimized by using the same exposure time for all experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12323099     DOI: 10.1089/106652702760277372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Biol        ISSN: 1066-5277            Impact factor:   1.479


  12 in total

1.  Design and preliminary analysis of a study to assess intra-device and inter-device variability of fluorescence spectroscopy instruments for detecting cervical neoplasia.

Authors:  Jong Soo Lee; Olga Shuhatovich; Roderick Price; Brian Pikkula; Michele Follen; Nick McKinnon; Calum Macaulay; Bobby Knight; Rebecca Richards-Kortum; Dennis D Cox
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Dynamics of dendritic cell maturation are identified through a novel filtering strategy applied to biological time-course microarray replicates.

Authors:  Amy L Olex; Elizabeth M Hiltbold; Xiaoyan Leng; Jacquelyn S Fetrow
Journal:  BMC Immunol       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 3.615

3.  A proposed metric for assessing the measurement quality of individual microarrays.

Authors:  Kyoungmi Kim; Grier P Page; T Mark Beasley; Stephen Barnes; Katherine E Scheirer; David B Allison
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-01-23       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  An approach for clustering gene expression data with error information.

Authors:  Brian Tjaden
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Genome-wide estimation of gender differences in the gene expression of human livers: statistical design and analysis.

Authors:  Robert R Delongchamp; Cruz Velasco; Stacey Dial; Angela J Harris
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  A qualitative assessment of direct-labeled cDNA products prior to microarray analysis.

Authors:  Sherry F Grissom; Edward K Lobenhofer; Charles J Tucker
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Data recovery and integration from public databases uncovers transformation-specific transcriptional downregulation of cAMP-PKA pathway-encoding genes.

Authors:  Chiara Balestrieri; Lilia Alberghina; Marco Vanoni; Ferdinando Chiaradonna
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  The effect of column purification on cDNA indirect labelling for microarrays.

Authors:  M Lia Molas; John Z Kiss
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 4.993

9.  The influence of tumor size and environment on gene expression in commonly used human tumor lines.

Authors:  Michael A Gieseg; Michael Z Man; Nicholas A Gorski; Steven J Madore; Eric P Kaldjian; Wilbur R Leopold
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Improving the statistical detection of regulated genes from microarray data using intensity-based variance estimation.

Authors:  Jason Comander; Sripriya Natarajan; Michael A Gimbrone; Guillermo García-Cardeña
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.