Literature DB >> 12297811

Free tissue transfer versus pedicled flap cost in head and neck cancer.

Gerry F Funk1, Lucy Hynds Karnell, Stacey Whitehead, Arnold Paulino, Joan Ricks, Russell B Smith.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the overall 1-year management costs for patients receiving a free tissue transfer with those of patients receiving a pedicled flap reconstruction as a component of their primary head and neck cancer treatment. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: Case-control, cost identification analysis of 21 matched pairs of patients and multivariate analysis of variables associated with treatment costs was conducted in a tertiary referral academic institution.
RESULTS: No significant difference in total 1-year charges between the pedicled and free tissue transfer groups was found. A structured measure of patient comorbidity was the only variable significantly associated with total 1-year charges.
CONCLUSIONS: Total 1-year treatment costs of primary upper aerodigestive tract cancers are similar for patients reconstructed with free tissue transfer or a pedicled flap. SIGNIFICANCE: Within the context of overall 1-year management costs, the primary determinants of health care expense for these patients are comorbidity and extent of disease, not reconstructive technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12297811     DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2002.127591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  9 in total

Review 1.  Economic burden of head and neck cancer. A literature review.

Authors:  Jennifer M Lee; Marco Turini; Marc F Botteman; Jennifer M Stephens; Chris L Pashos
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2004-02

Review 2.  Free flap transfer in cranio-maxillofacial surgery: a review of the current data.

Authors:  M Thorwarth; C Eulzer; R Bader; C Wolf; M Schmidt; S Schultze-Mosgau
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-09

3.  Bipaddle Pectoralis Major Myocutaneous Flap for Single Stage Reconstruction of Oromandibular Defects.

Authors:  P K Sahu; Satish Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-08-19

Review 4.  Surgical reconstruction in patients with cancer of the head and neck.

Authors:  Emre Vural
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  Regional Myocutaneous Flaps for Head and Neck Reconstruction: Experience of a Head and Neck Cancer Unit.

Authors:  Eyituoyo Okoturo
Journal:  Niger J Surg       Date:  2015 Jul-Dec

6.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of a postoperative clinical care pathway in head and neck surgery with microvascular reconstruction.

Authors:  Jonathan F Dautremont; Luke R Rudmik; Justin Yeung; Tiffany Asante; Steve C Nakoneshny; Monica Hoy; Amanda Lui; Shamir P Chandarana; Thomas W Matthews; Christiaan Schrag; Joseph C Dort
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-12-19

Review 7.  Contemporary role of pectoralis major regional flaps in head and neck surgery.

Authors:  F Bussu; R Gallus; V Navach; R Bruschini; M Tagliabue; G Almadori; G Paludetti; L Calabrese
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.124

8.  Microsurgical free flaps: Controversies in maxillofacial reconstruction.

Authors:  Rinku K George; Arvind Krishnamurthy
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-01

9.  Salvage of failed local and regional flaps with porcine urinary bladder extracellular matrix aided tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Gregory J Kruper; Zachary P Vandegriend; Ho-Sheng Lin; Giancarlo F Zuliani
Journal:  Case Rep Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.