Literature DB >> 12297766

Comparative performance in the porcine esophagus of different solutions used for submucosal injection.

Massimo Conio1, Elizabeth Rajan, Darius Sorbi, Ian Norton, Lori Herman, Rosangela Filiberti, Christopher J Gostout.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Before endoscopic mucosal resection and polypectomy of sessile lesions, injection of fluid into the submucosa cushions and isolates the tissue and thereby reduces thermal injury and the risk for perforation and hemorrhage. This study investigated the performance of 5 different solutions when used to form submucosal fluid cushions in the porcine esophagus.
METHODS: Five groups of 5 pigs were studied. In each pig, 6 separate submucosal injections of 5 mL of a single test solution were performed within the distal third of the esophagus. The time required for the submucosal bleb to flatten completely was recorded after each injection. The solutions used were as follows: normal saline solution, normal saline plus epinephrine solution, 50% dextrose, 10% glycerine/5% fructose in normal saline solution, and 1% rooster comb hyaluronic acid.
RESULTS: The normal saline solution and normal saline plus epinephrine solutions had the shortest disappearance times (respectively, median 2.4 and 3.0 minutes), which were significantly shorter compared with the other test solutions. The mean disappearance times for 50% dextrose and 10% glycerine were, respectively, 4.7 and 4.2 minutes. The mean disappearance time for hyaluronic acid was 22.1 minutes.
CONCLUSIONS: A solution of hyaluronic acid appears to be ideal for producing a lasting submucosal cushion for prolonged procedures. Dextrose 50% is superior to normal saline solution and may serve as an alternative to hyaluronic acid in terms of availability and cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12297766     DOI: 10.1067/mge.2002.128107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  24 in total

1.  Technical issues and new devices of ESD of early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Wan Sik Lee; Jin Woong Cho; Young Dae Kim; Kyu Jong Kim; Byung Ik Jang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Esophageal granular cell tumor treated by endoscopic mucosal resection. A case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Antonella De Ceglie; Beatrice Gatteschi; Sabrina Blanchi; Francesco Scotto; Antonio Pellecchia; Massimo Conio
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Combination of water-jet dissection and needle-knife as a hybrid knife simplifies endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Tobias Lingenfelder; Klaus Fischer; Moritz G Sold; Stefan Post; Markus D Enderle; Georg F B A Kaehler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastrointestinal neoplasms.

Authors:  Naomi Kakushima; Mitsuhiro Fujishiro
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  A New Ex Vivo Model for the Evaluation of Endoscopic Submucosal Injection Material Performance.

Authors:  Ryohei Hirose; Tomo Daidoji; Yuji Naito; Osamu Dohi; Naohisa Yoshida; Hiroaki Yasuda; Hideyuki Konishi; Takaaki Nakaya; Yoshito Itoh
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Effectiveness of sodium alginate as a submucosal injection material for endoscopic mucosal resection in animal.

Authors:  Soo Hoon Eun; Joo Young Cho; In Seop Jung; Bong Min Ko; Soo Jin Hong; Chang Beom Ryu; Jin Oh Kim; So Young Jin; Joon Seong Lee; Moon Sung Lee; Chan Sup Shim; Boo Sung Kim
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 4.519

Review 7.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for stomach neoplasms.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Fujishiro
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  IMPROVED EXPERIMENTAL MODEL TO EVALUATE SUBMUCOSAL INJECTION SOLUTIONS FOR ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION.

Authors:  Kendi Yamazaki; Fauze Maluf-Filho; Vitor Alves Pessoa da Costa; Fernanda Cristina Simões Pessorrusso; Fabio Yuji Hondo; Paulo Sakai; Luis Francisco Poli de Figueiredo
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

9.  The safety and efficacy in humans of endoscopic mucosal resection with hydroxypropyl methylcellulose as compared with normal saline.

Authors:  Christopher J Bacani; Timothy A Woodward; Massimo Raimondo; Mohammad A Al-Haddad; Kyung W Noh; Surakit Pungpapong; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Submucosal injection solution for gastrointestinal tract endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Toshio Uraoka; Yutaka Saito; Kazuhide Yamamoto; Takahiro Fujii
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 4.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.