OBJECTIVE: To examine volumetric MRI correlates of longitudinal cognitive decline in normal aging, AD, and subcortical cerebrovascular brain injury (SCVBI). BACKGROUND: Previous cross-sectional studies examining the relationship between cognitive impairment and dementia have shown that hippocampal and cortical gray matter atrophy are the most important predictors of cognitive impairment, even in cases with SCVBI. The authors hypothesized that hippocampal and cortical gray matter volume also would best predict rate of cognitive decline in cases with and without SCVBI. METHODS: Subjects were recruited for a multicenter study of contributions to dementia of AD and SCVBI. The sample (n = 120) included cognitively normal, cognitively impaired, and demented cases with and without lacunes identified by MRI. Cases with cortical strokes were excluded. Average length of follow-up was 3.0 years. Measures of hippocampal volume, volume of cortical gray matter, presence of subcortical lacunes, and volume of white matter hyperintensity were derived from MRI. Random effects modeling of longitudinal data was used to assess effects of baseline MRI variables on longitudinal change in a measure of global cognitive ability. RESULTS: Cortical gray matter atrophy predicted cognitive decline regardless of whether lacunes were present. Hippocampal atrophy predicted decline only in those without lacunes. Neither lacunes nor white matter hyperintensity independently predicted decline. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that cortical atrophy is an index of disease severity in both AD and subcortical cerebrovascular brain injury and consequently predicts faster progression. Hippocampal volume may index disease severity and predict progression in AD. The absence of this effect in cases with lacunes suggests that this group is etiologically heterogeneous and is not composed simply of cases of AD with incidental stroke.
OBJECTIVE: To examine volumetric MRI correlates of longitudinal cognitive decline in normal aging, AD, and subcortical cerebrovascular brain injury (SCVBI). BACKGROUND: Previous cross-sectional studies examining the relationship between cognitive impairment and dementia have shown that hippocampal and cortical gray matter atrophy are the most important predictors of cognitive impairment, even in cases with SCVBI. The authors hypothesized that hippocampal and cortical gray matter volume also would best predict rate of cognitive decline in cases with and without SCVBI. METHODS: Subjects were recruited for a multicenter study of contributions to dementia of AD and SCVBI. The sample (n = 120) included cognitively normal, cognitively impaired, and demented cases with and without lacunes identified by MRI. Cases with cortical strokes were excluded. Average length of follow-up was 3.0 years. Measures of hippocampal volume, volume of cortical gray matter, presence of subcortical lacunes, and volume of white matter hyperintensity were derived from MRI. Random effects modeling of longitudinal data was used to assess effects of baseline MRI variables on longitudinal change in a measure of global cognitive ability. RESULTS: Cortical gray matter atrophy predicted cognitive decline regardless of whether lacunes were present. Hippocampal atrophy predicted decline only in those without lacunes. Neither lacunes nor white matter hyperintensity independently predicted decline. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that cortical atrophy is an index of disease severity in both AD and subcortical cerebrovascular brain injury and consequently predicts faster progression. Hippocampal volume may index disease severity and predict progression in AD. The absence of this effect in cases with lacunes suggests that this group is etiologically heterogeneous and is not composed simply of cases of AD with incidental stroke.
Authors: C R Jack; R C Petersen; Y C Xu; P C O'Brien; G E Smith; R J Ivnik; B F Boeve; S C Waring; E G Tangalos; E Kokmen Journal: Neurology Date: 1999-04-22 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Z Nagy; M M Esiri; K A Jobst; J H Morris; E M King; B McDonald; C Joachim; S Litchfield; L Barnetson; A D Smith Journal: J Neuropathol Exp Neurol Date: 1997-02 Impact factor: 3.685
Authors: J W Haller; A Banerjee; G E Christensen; M Gado; S Joshi; M I Miller; Y Sheline; M W Vannier; J G Csernansky Journal: Radiology Date: 1997-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: M P Laakso; H Soininen; K Partanen; M Lehtovirta; M Hallikainen; T Hänninen; E L Helkala; P Vainio; P J Riekkinen Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 1998 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: J W Haller; G E Christensen; S C Joshi; J W Newcomer; M I Miller; J G Csernansky; M W Vannier Journal: Radiology Date: 1996-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Bradford C Dickerson; David H Salat; Julianna F Bates; Monika Atiya; Ronald J Killiany; Douglas N Greve; Anders M Dale; Chantal E Stern; Deborah Blacker; Marilyn S Albert; Reisa A Sperling Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Jeannie-Marie S Leoutsakos; Dingfen Han; Michelle M Mielke; Sarah N Forrester; JoAnn T Tschanz; Chris D Corcoran; Robert C Green; Maria C Norton; Kathleen A Welsh-Bohmer; Constantine G Lyketsos Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2012-06-12 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: D Mungas; D Harvey; B R Reed; W J Jagust; C DeCarli; L Beckett; W J Mack; J H Kramer; M W Weiner; N Schuff; H C Chui Journal: Neurology Date: 2005-08-23 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: An-Tao Du; Norbert Schuff; Linda L Chao; John Kornak; William J Jagust; Joel H Kramer; Bruce R Reed; Bruce L Miller; David Norman; Helena C Chui; Michael W Weiner Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2005-06-14 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Nicola Moscufo; Charles R G Guttmann; Dominik Meier; Istvan Csapo; Peter G Hildenbrand; Brian C Healy; Julia A Schmidt; Leslie Wolfson Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2009-05-09 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Gagan S Wig; Scott T Grafton; Kathryn E Demos; George L Wolford; Steven E Petersen; William M Kelley Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-11-10 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jonathan H Morra; Zhuowen Tu; Liana G Apostolova; Amity E Green; Christina Avedissian; Sarah K Madsen; Neelroop Parikshak; Xue Hua; Arthur W Toga; Clifford R Jack; Norbert Schuff; Michael W Weiner; Paul M Thompson Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 5.038