Literature DB >> 12296748

Toward true DNA base-stacking energies: MP2, CCSD(T), and complete basis set calculations.

Pavel Hobza1, Jirí Sponer.   

Abstract

Stacking energies in low-energy geometries of pyrimidine, uracil, cytosine, and guanine homodimers were determined by the MP2 and CCSD(T) calculations utilizing a wide range of split-valence, correlation-consistent, and bond-functions basis sets. Complete basis set MP2 (CBS MP2) stacking energies extrapolated using aug-cc-pVXZ (X = D, T, and for pyrimidine dimer Q) basis sets equal to -5.3, -12.3, and -11.2 kcal/mol for the first three dimers, respectively. Higher-order correlation corrections estimated as the difference between MP2 and CCSD(T) stacking energies amount to 2.0, 0.7, and 0.9 kcal/mol and lead to final estimates of the genuine stacking energies for the three dimers of -3.4, -11.6, and -10.4 kcal/mol. The CBS MP2 stacking-energy estimate for guanine dimer (-14.8 kcal/mol) was based on the 6-31G(0.25) and aug-cc-pVDZ calculations. This simplified extrapolation can be routinely used with a meaningful accuracy around 1 kcal/mol for large aromatic stacking clusters. The final estimate of the guanine stacking energy after the CCSD(T) correction amounts to -12.9 kcal/mol. The MP2/6-31G(0.25) method previously used as the standard level to calculate aromatic stacking in hundreds of geometries of nucleobase dimers systematically underestimates the base stacking by ca. 1.0-2.5 kcal/mol per stacked dimer, covering 75-90% of the intermolecular correlation stabilization. We suggest that this correction is to be considered in calibration of force fields and other cheaper computational methods. The quality of the MP2/6-31G(0.25) predictions is nevertheless considerably better than suggested on the basis of monomer polarizability calculations. Fast and very accurate estimates of the MP2 aromatic stacking energies can be achieved using the RI-MP2 method. The CBS MP2 calculations and the CCSD(T) correction, when taken together, bring only marginal changes to the relative stability of H-bonded and stacked base pairs, with a slight shift of ca. 1 kcal/mol in favor of H-bonding. We suggest that the present values are very close to ultimate predictions of the strength of aromatic base stacking of DNA and RNA bases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12296748     DOI: 10.1021/ja026759n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  43 in total

1.  Homodimers of cytosine and 1-methylcytosine. A DFT study of geometry, relative stability and H-NMR shifts in gas-phase and selected solvents.

Authors:  Guvanchmyrat Paytakov; Leonid Gorb; Andriy Stepanyugin; Svitlana Samiylenko; Dmytro Hovorun; Jerzy Leszczynski
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  A binding mechanism in protein-nucleotide interactions: implication for U1A RNA binding.

Authors:  Victor Guallar; Kenneth W Borrelli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  RNA challenges for computational chemists.

Authors:  Ilyas Yildirim; Douglas H Turner
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Pi-pi stacking tackled with density functional theory.

Authors:  Marcel Swart; Tushar van der Wijst; Célia Fonseca Guerra; F Matthias Bickelhaupt
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 1.810

5.  How does modification of adenine by hydroxyl radical influence the stability and the nature of stacking interactions in adenine-cytosine complex?

Authors:  Zaneta Czyznikowska
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  Structural and energetic heterogeneities of canonical and oxidized central guanine triad of B-DNA telomeric fragments.

Authors:  Piotr Cysewski; Przemysław Czeleń
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 1.810

7.  Quantum chemical studies of nucleic acids: can we construct a bridge to the RNA structural biology and bioinformatics communities?

Authors:  Jiří Šponer; Judit E Šponer; Anton I Petrov; Neocles B Leontis
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Further analysis and comparative study of intermolecular interactions using dimers from the S22 database.

Authors:  Laszlo Fusti Molnar; Xiao He; Bing Wang; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Reparameterization of RNA chi Torsion Parameters for the AMBER Force Field and Comparison to NMR Spectra for Cytidine and Uridine.

Authors:  Ilyas Yildirim; Harry A Stern; Scott D Kennedy; Jason D Tubbs; Douglas H Turner
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Theoretical study on the complexes of benzene with isoelectronic nitrogen-containing heterocycles.

Authors:  Weizhou Wang; Pavel Hobza
Journal:  Chemphyschem       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 3.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.