Literature DB >> 1227851

Methylmercury in the environment: a review of current understanding.

W Stopford, L J Goldwater.   

Abstract

The danger of methylmercury poisoning appears to be slight when the environment is not directly contaminated with methylmercury. Sediments rapidly bind mercury and decrease its availability to aquatic organisms. Sediments further have a greater propensity to demethylate than to methylate mercury. In noncontaminated aquatic ecosystems, the concentrations of methylmercury and inorganic mercury are many times lower than those that have been found to cause toxicity, even in the most sensitive organisms. Methylmercury bound to protein is comparatively less toxic than methylmercury salts, and selenium present in this protein appear to be one of the major detoxifying agents for methylmercury. This is particularly important in seafood, where there is an excess of selenium compared to methylmercury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1227851      PMCID: PMC1475018          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.7512115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  9 in total

1.  Methylmercuric complexes in aquatic systems.

Authors:  R G Zepp; G L Baughman; N L Wolfe; D M Cline
Journal:  Environ Lett       Date:  1974-02

2.  Organic mercury compounds in coastal waters.

Authors:  W F Fitzgerald; W B Lyons
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1973-04-13       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Geetic effects of organic mercury compounds. I. Cytological investigations on Allium roots.

Authors:  C Ramel
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  1969       Impact factor: 3.271

4.  Effects of various metals on behavior of conditioned goldfish.

Authors:  P A Weir; C H Hine
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1970-01

5.  Studies on the biotransformation of 203Hg-labeled methyl mercury chloride in rats.

Authors:  T Norseth; T W Clarkson
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1970-12

6.  Biological methylation of mercury in aquatic organisms.

Authors:  S Jensen; A Jernelöv
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1969-08-16       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Mercury compounds reduce photosynthesis by plankton.

Authors:  R C Harriss; D B White; R B Macfarlane
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-11-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Selenium: relation to decreased toxicity of methylmercury added to diets containing tuna.

Authors:  H E Ganther; C Goudie; M L Sunde; M J Kopecky; P Wagner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-03-10       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Methylmercury: bacterial degradation in lake sediments.

Authors:  W J Spangler; J L Spigarelli; J M Rose; H M Miller
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-04-13       Impact factor: 47.728

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Heavy metal concentrations in the Holston River Basin (Tennessee).

Authors:  G J Young; R D Blevins
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Mercury Concentrations in Four Marine Fishery Resources from Rio de Janeiro Coast, SW Atlantic, and Potential Human Health Risk Via Fish Consumption.

Authors:  Arthur de Barros Bauer; Thaís de Castro Paiva; Carlos Alberto de Moura Barboza; Olaf Malm; Luciano Gomes Fischer
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Mercury Exposure Among Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Miners in Four Regions in Uganda.

Authors:  Mercy Wendy Wanyana; Friday E Agaba; Deogratias K Sekimpi; Victoria N Mukasa; Geoffrey N Kamese; Nkonge Douglas; John C Ssempebwa
Journal:  J Health Pollut       Date:  2020-05-28

4.  Acute Methylmercury Exposure and the Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α Signaling Pathway under Normoxic Conditions in the Rat Brain and Astrocytes in Vitro.

Authors:  Jie Chang; Bobo Yang; Yun Zhou; Changsheng Yin; Tingting Liu; Hai Qian; Guangwei Xing; Suhua Wang; Fang Li; Yubin Zhang; Da Chen; Michael Aschner; Rongzhu Lu
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  Methylmercury in fish: a review of residue levels, fish consumption and regulatory action in the United States.

Authors:  L Tollefson; F Cordle
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 9.031

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.