Literature DB >> 12271917

Women's experiences with ovarian cancer: reflections on being diagnosed.

Margaret Fitch1, Karen Deane, Doris Howell, Ross E Gray.   

Abstract

The purpose of this qualitative study was to describe the perspectives of women living with ovarian cancer about their experiences with diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up care. A convenience sample of 18 women was interviewed using an open-ended interview guide. This paper will focus on their perspectives during the peri-diagnostic period. Most of the women in this study experienced changes in their bodies--bloating, weight gain around their middles, indigestion, bowel changes, and abdominal pain. The vagueness of the symptoms and lack of awareness by the women and, in the women's opinion, health care professionals caused delays in diagnosis and initial investigations of other body systems. The symptoms were often dismissed by the women as being related to normal body changes such as childbirth, menopause, or stress responses. It was often not until the women's symptoms became severe or included pain that referrals were made to relevant specialists. At this point, many of the women were physically and emotionally spent, leaving them vulnerable and in a weakened state for confronting the diagnosis and coping with the difficult course of treatment. Clearly, the subtle, nebulous nature of the symptoms confounded the diagnosis of ovarian cancer for these women, resulting in patient delays and physician delays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12271917     DOI: 10.5737/1181912x123152159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Oncol Nurs J        ISSN: 1181-912X


  8 in total

1.  Weight change during chemotherapy as a potential prognostic factor for stage III epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  L M Hess; R Barakat; C Tian; R F Ozols; D S Alberts
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Affective science perspectives on cancer control: strategically crafting a mutually beneficial research agenda.

Authors:  Rebecca A Ferrer; Paige A Green; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-05

3.  Gynecological cancer patients' differentiated use of help from a nurse navigator: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Marianne K Thygesen; Birthe D Pedersen; Jakob Kragstrup; Lis Wagner; Ole Mogensen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Benefits and challenges perceived by patients with cancer when offered a nurse navigator.

Authors:  Marianne K Thygesen; Birthe D Pedersen; Jakob Kragstrup; Lis Wagner; Ole Mogensen
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 5.120

Review 5.  Over-reassurance and undersupport after a 'false alarm': a systematic review of the impact on subsequent cancer symptom attribution and help seeking.

Authors:  Cristina Renzi; Katriina L Whitaker; Jane Wardle
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Diagnostic Models Combining Clinical Information, Ultrasound and Biochemical Markers for Ovarian Cancer: Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Clare F Davenport; Nirmala Rai; Pawana Sharma; Jon Deeks; Sarah Berhane; Sue Mallett; Pratyusha Saha; Rita Solanki; Susan Bayliss; Kym Snell; Sudha Sundar
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 6.575

7.  Risk factors for delayed presentation and referral of symptomatic cancer: evidence for common cancers.

Authors:  U Macleod; E D Mitchell; C Burgess; S Macdonald; A J Ramirez
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Identifying symptoms of ovarian cancer: a qualitative and quantitative study.

Authors:  C R Bankhead; C Collins; H Stokes-Lampard; P Rose; S Wilson; A Clements; D Mant; S T Kehoe; J Austoker
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 6.531

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.