Literature DB >> 12271847

The effect of bruxism on treatment planning for dental implants.

Carl E Misch.   

Abstract

Bruxism is a potential risk factor for implant failure. Excessive force is the primary cause of late implant complications. An appreciation of the etiology of crestal bone loss, failure of implants, failure to retain implant restorations, and fracture of components will lead the practitioner to develop a treatment plan that reduces force on implants and their restorations. The forces are considered in terms of magnitude, duration, direction, type, and magnification. Once the dentist has identified the source(s) of additional force on the implant system, the treatment plan is altered to contend with and reduce the negative sequelae on the bone, implant, and final restoration. One viable approach is to increase the implant-bone surface area. Additional implants can be placed to decrease stress on any one implant, and implants in molar regions should have an increased width. Use of more and wider implants decreases the strain on the prosthesis and also dissipates stress to the bone, especially at the crest. The additional implants should be positioned with intent to eliminate cantilevers when possible. Greater surface area implant designs made of titanium alloy and with an external hex design can also prove advantageous. Anterior guidance in mandibular excursions further decreases force and eliminates or reduces lateral posterior force. Metal occlusal surfaces decrease the risk of porcelain fracture and do not require as much abutment reduction, which in turn enhances prosthesis retention. The retention of the final prosthesis or super-structure is also improved with additional implant abutments. Night guards designed with specific features also are a benefit to initially diagnose the influence of occlusal factors for the patient, and as importantly, to reduce the influence of extraneous stress on implants and implant-retained restorations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12271847

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Today        ISSN: 8750-2186


  6 in total

1.  A three-dimensional finite element analysis of the relationship between masticatory performance and skeletal malocclusion.

Authors:  Jung-Chul Park; Hyun-Seung Shin; Jung-Yul Cha; Jong-Tae Park
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.614

2.  Clinical management of implant prostheses in patients with bruxism.

Authors:  Osamu Komiyama; Frank Lobbezoo; Antoon De Laat; Takashi Iida; Tsuyoshi Kitagawa; Hiroshi Murakami; Takao Kato; Misao Kawara
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2012-06-04

3.  Dental Implants Placed in Patients with Mechanical Risk Factors: A Long-term Follow-up Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Piero Papi; Stefano Di Carlo; Francesca Mencio; Daniele Rosella; Francesca De Angelis; Giorgio Pompa
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2017-06-20

4.  Axial Displacements and Removal Torque Changes of Five Different Implant-Abutment Connections under Static Vertical Loading.

Authors:  Ki-Seong Kim; Young-Jun Lim
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Evaluation of jaw bone density and morphology in bruxers using panoramic radiography.

Authors:  Ozlem Isman
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2020-10-03       Impact factor: 2.080

6.  Assessment of Survival Rate of Dental Implants in Patients with Bruxism: A 5-year Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Rajkiran Chitumalla; K V Halini Kumari; Abhilash Mohapatra; Anuj Singh Parihar; K S Anand; Padmavathi Katragadda
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2018-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.