Literature DB >> 12271414

Does diabetes affect [(18)F]FDG standardised uptake values in lung cancer?

Miguel Gorenberg1, William A Hallett, Michael J O'Doherty.   

Abstract

The correlation of hyperglycaemia with decreased 2-[(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy- D-glucose (FDG) uptake by tumours in positron emission tomography (PET) imaging has been clearly established. The available data are mainly based on non-diabetic (non-DM) patients exposed to acute hyperglycaemia after glucose infusion, and little is known about the effect of diabetes mellitus (DM) on FDG uptake by tumours. In this retrospective study we performed a comparison of the tumour uptake in 40 DM patients with the tumour uptake in 145 non-DM patients, all with primary lung malignancies. Peak standardised uptake values (SUVs) without glucose correction were calculated for the lung lesions. Mean (+/-standard deviation) blood glucose concentrations were 6.58+/-2.46 mmol/l in the DM patients and 4.39+/-0.89 mmol/l in the non-DM patients. There was no significant difference between tumour SUVs in DM patients (79 lesions), 5.86+/-3.97, and those in non-DM patients (234 lesions), 6.47+/-4.61. There was no significant difference between tumour SUVs in DM patients with blood glucose <7 mmol/l ( n=28, 64 lesions), 5.91+/-3.98, and those in DM patients with blood glucose >7 mmol/l ( n=12, 15 lesions), 5.68+/-4.09. There was also no significant difference between myocardial SUVs in the DM patients ( n=40), 3.28+/-2.75, and in a similar group of non-DM patients ( n=42), 3.30+/-2.24. We conclude that FDG uptake in lung tumours is not significantly influenced by blood glucose levels in diabetic patients whose blood glucose levels are reasonably well controlled.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12271414     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-002-0887-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  15 in total

1.  Diagnostic value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for lymph node metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Yamada; Masao Hosokawa; Kazuo Itoh; Toshinao Takenouchi; Yoshihiro Kinoshita; Tomohiro Kikkawa; Keita Sakashita; Shion Uemura; Yasunori Nishida; Takaya Kusumi; Shigeyuki Sasaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Diabetes and PET Scans: Only Part of a Bigger Problem.

Authors:  Amit Khithani
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2009-07

3.  Altered FDG uptake patterns in pediatric lymphoblastic lymphoma patients receiving induction chemotherapy that includes very high dose corticosteroids.

Authors:  Susan E Sharp; Michael J Gelfand; Michael J Absalon
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-09-01

4.  Optimization of whole-body positron emission tomography imaging by using delayed 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D: -glucose Injection following I.V. Insulin in diabetic patients.

Authors:  Eric Turcotte; Michel Leblanc; André Carpentier; François Bénard
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Does diabetes mellitus influence the efficacy of FDG-PET in the diagnosis of cervical cancer?

Authors:  Yu-Chen Chang; Tzu-Chen Yen; Koon-Kwan Ng; Lai-Chu See; Chyong-Huey Lai; Ting-Chang Chang; Chien-Sheng Tsai; Ji-Hong Hong; Swei Hsueh; Hung-Hsueh Chou
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-02-10       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Metabolic tumour burden assessed by ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT associated with serum CA19-9 predicts pancreatic cancer outcome after resection.

Authors:  Hua-Xiang Xu; Tao Chen; Wen-Quan Wang; Chun-Tao Wu; Chen Liu; Jiang Long; Jin Xu; Ying-Jian Zhang; Run-Hao Chen; Liang Liu; Xian-Jun Yu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  The role of positron emission tomography in the management of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Abdollah Behzadi; Yee Ung; Val Lowe; Claude Deschamps
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Influence of Diabetes on the Interpretation of PET Scans in Patients With Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Michael Haley; Andre Konski; Tianyu Li; Jonathan D Cheng; Alan Maurer; Oleh Haluszka; Walter Scott; Neal J Meropol; Steven J Cohen; Gary Freedman
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2009-07

9.  The power of FDG-PET to detect treatment effects is increased by glucose correction using a Michaelis constant.

Authors:  Simon-Peter Williams; Judith E Flores-Mercado; Andreas R Baudy; Ruediger E Port; Thomas Bengtsson
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.138

10.  Quantitation of glucose uptake in tumors by dynamic FDG-PET has less glucose bias and lower variability when adjusted for partial saturation of glucose transport.

Authors:  Simon-Peter Williams; Judith E Flores-Mercado; Ruediger E Port; Thomas Bengtsson
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.