Literature DB >> 12270854

Contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention versus balloon angioplasty for multivessel coronary artery disease: a comparison of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry and the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) study.

V S Srinivas1, Maria Mori Brooks, Katherine M Detre, Spencer B King, Alice K Jacobs, Janet Johnston, David O Williams.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This investigation compares the results of contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with standard balloon angioplasty among patients with multivessel coronary disease. Patients having balloon angioplasty in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) and those within the Dynamic Registry meeting BARI eligibility criteria were studied. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Clinical features and in-hospital and 1-year outcomes of 857 BARI-eligible patients in the Dynamic Registry (contemporary PCI) were compared with the 904 randomized patients who underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in BARI. Compared with BARI patients, Registry patients had fewer lesions attempted (1.53 versus 2.56, P=0.001), more frequent single-vessel PCI (76% versus 33%, P<0.001), greater use of intracoronary stents (76% versus 1%, P<0.001), and GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist (24% versus 0%, P<0.001). Angiographic success was achieved more often among Registry patients (91% versus 72%, P<0.001), whereas abrupt closure (1.5% versus 9.5%, P<0.001) and in-hospital coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) (1.9% versus 10.2%, P<0.001) and myocardial infarction (0.8% versus 2.1%, P=0.025) were less common. No differences were observed in either in-hospital or 1-year death, but 1-year death/myocardial infarction was lower in the Registry. Registry patients had lower 1-year rates of subsequent CABG (8.6% versus 22.7%, P<0.001) and PCI (12.4% versus 22.5%, P<0.001). By multivariate analysis, contemporary PCI was independently associated with reduced risk for in-hospital CABG, 1-year CABG, and 1-year PCI.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with multivessel disease, contemporary PCI resulted in safer and more durable revascularization. These results support the role of PCI for selected patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12270854     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.0000031570.27023.79

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  21 in total

Review 1.  Multi-vessel coronary disease and percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  C Casey; David P Faxon
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Revascularization for left main and multivessel coronary artery disease in the drug-eluting stent era: integration of recent drug-eluting stent trials.

Authors:  Samip Vasaiwala; David O Williams
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Trends in postacute myocardial infarction management and mortality in patients with diabetes. A population-based study from 1995 to 2001.

Authors:  Najwa Ouhoummane; Belkacem Abdous; Rabia Louchini; Louis Rochette; Paul Poirier
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 4.  Chronic total occlusion: To treat or not to treat.

Authors:  Alfredo Bardají; Judit Rodriguez-López; Mauricio Torres-Sánchez
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-26

Review 5.  Recanalization of Chronic Total Occlusion Lesions: A Critical Appraisal of Current Devices and Techniques.

Authors:  Bhargav Dave
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-09-01

6.  Coronary intervention in diabetes: is it different.

Authors:  Amit Malviya; Animesh Mishra
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2015-03-10

7.  Adenosine sestamibi SPECT post-infarction evaluation (INSPIRE) trial: A randomized, prospective multicenter trial evaluating the role of adenosine Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT for assessing risk and therapeutic outcomes in survivors of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  John J Mahmarian; Leslee J Shaw; Gerald H Olszewski; Bradley K Pounds; Maria E Frias; Craig M Pratt
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Hospital percutaneous coronary intervention volume and patient mortality, 1998 to 2000: does the evidence support current procedure volume minimums?

Authors:  Andrew J Epstein; Saif S Rathore; Kevin G M Volpp; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Natural history of experimental arterial chronic total occlusions.

Authors:  Ronen Jaffe; General Leung; Nigel R Munce; Amandeep S Thind; Howard Leong-Poi; Kevan J T Anderson; Xiuling Qi; Judy Trogadis; Ariella Nadler; Davida Shiff; Jamie Saperia; Julia Lockwood; Chaim Jacobs; Beiping Qiang; Aaron Teitelbaum; Alexander J Dick; John D Sparkes; Jagdish Butany; Graham A Wright; Bradley H Strauss
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Percutaneous coronary intervention to treat chronic total occlusion: predictors of technical success and one-year clinical outcome.

Authors:  Mojtaba Salarifar; Mohammad-Reza Mousavi; Sepideh Saroukhani; Ebrahim Nematipour; Seyed Ebrahim Kassaian; Mohammad Alidoosti; Hamid-Reza Poorhosseini; Ali-Mohammad Haji-Zeinali; Younes Nozari; Kianoush Hosseini; Arash Jalali
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2014-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.