Literature DB >> 12270102

An indirect approach to the extensive calculation of relationship coefficients.

Jean-Jacques Colleau1.   

Abstract

A method was described for calculating population statistics on relationship coefficients without using corresponding individual data. It relied on the structure of the inverse of the numerator relationship matrix between individuals under investigation and ancestors. Computation times were observed on simulated populations and were compared to those incurred with a conventional direct approach. The indirect approach turned out to be very efficient for multiplying the relationship matrix corresponding to planned matings (full design) by any vector. Efficiency was generally still good or very good for calculating statistics on these simulated populations. An extreme implementation of the method is the calculation of inbreeding coefficients themselves. Relative performances of the indirect method were good except when many full-sibs during many generations existed in the population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12270102      PMCID: PMC2705453          DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-34-4-409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Sel Evol        ISSN: 0999-193X            Impact factor:   4.297


(To access the full article, please see PDF)
  26 in total

1.  Ancestral Relationships Using Metafounders: Finite Ancestral Populations and Across Population Relationships.

Authors:  Andres Legarra; Ole F Christensen; Zulma G Vitezica; Ignacio Aguilar; Ignacy Misztal
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The impact of reducing the frequency of animals genotyped at higher density on imputation and prediction accuracies using ssGBLUP1.

Authors:  Bruna P Sollero; Jeremy T Howard; Matthew L Spangler
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  The impact of selective genotyping on the response to selection using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction.

Authors:  Jeremy T Howard; Tom A Rathje; Caitlyn E Bruns; Danielle F Wilson-Wells; Stephen D Kachman; Matthew L Spangler
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Genomic prediction using pooled data in a single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction framework.

Authors:  Johnna L Baller; Stephen D Kachman; Larry A Kuehn; Matthew L Spangler
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Single-step SNP-BLUP with on-the-fly imputed genotypes and residual polygenic effects.

Authors:  Matti Taskinen; Esa A Mäntysaari; Ismo Strandén
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 4.297

6.  Comparison of models for missing pedigree in single-step genomic prediction.

Authors:  Yutaka Masuda; Shogo Tsuruta; Matias Bermann; Heather L Bradford; Ignacy Misztal
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Optimized diffusion of buck semen for saving genetic variability in selected dairy goat populations.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Colleau; Virginie Clément; Pierre Martin; Isabelle Palhière
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.797

8.  Inversion of a part of the numerator relationship matrix using pedigree information.

Authors:  Pierre Faux; Nicolas Gengler
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Compatibility of pedigree-based and marker-based relationship matrices for single-step genetic evaluation.

Authors:  Ole F Christensen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  A nonsense mutation in B3GALNT2 is concordant with hydrocephalus in Friesian horses.

Authors:  Bart J Ducro; Anouk Schurink; John W M Bastiaansen; Iris J M Boegheim; Frank G van Steenbeek; Manon Vos-Loohuis; Isaac J Nijman; Glen R Monroe; Ids Hellinga; Bert W Dibbits; Willem Back; Peter A J Leegwater
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.