Literature DB >> 12269920

Serum interleukin-6 measurement in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Günay Gürleyik1, Emin Gürleyik, Fuat Cetinkaya, Selcuk Unalmiser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many attempts have been made to determine ways of decreasing the negative laparotomy rate after a clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The aim of the present study was to determine the effectiveness of serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) concentration in the diagnosis of appendicitis, and in the prevention of non-therapeutic laparotomy in patients with right iliac fossa pain.
METHODS: Serum IL-6 concentrations were measured at admission in 77 consecutive patients who were operated on for the treatment of acute appendicitis. The final diagnosis was established by histopathological examination. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of IL-6 concentrations in the diagnosis of appendicitis were calculated.
RESULTS: The negative laparotomy rate was 17% (13/77) in this series. The IL-6 level was elevated in seven of 13 patients (54%; false positive) with a normal appendix. The IL-6 level was normal in 10/64 patients (16%; false negative) with acute appendicitis. The IL-6 level was highly elevated in all patients with perforated appendicitis. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated as 84, 46, 78, and 89 and 38%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Unacceptably high false negative and positive rates decrease the accuracy of the serum IL-6 test for appendicitis. Serum IL-6 measurement is not of benefit in increasing the accuracy of the diagnosis of appendicitis. Serum IL-6 results are not useful for preventing negative laparotomies in the majority of patients with right iliac fossa pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12269920     DOI: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2002.02516.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  7 in total

Review 1.  The use of "overall accuracy" to evaluate the validity of screening or diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Anthony J Alberg; Ji Wan Park; Brant W Hager; Malcolm V Brock; Marie Diener-West
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Discriminative accuracy of novel and traditional biomarkers in children with suspected appendicitis adjusted for duration of abdominal pain.

Authors:  Anupam B Kharbanda; Yohaimi Cosme; Khin Liu; Steven L Spitalnik; Peter S Dayan
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  The diagnostic values of procalcitonin and interleukin 6 in acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Alireza Rastgoo Haghi; Amir Kasraianfard; Alireza Monsef; Amin Shoa Kazemi; Siavash Rahimi; Seyed Mohammad Reza Javadi
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2018-11-20

4.  Clinical and laboratory methods in diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children.

Authors:  Mojca Groselj-Grenc; Stane Repse; Dubravka Vidmar; Metka Derganc
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.351

5.  Diagnostic value of blood inflammatory markers for detection of acute appendicitis in children.

Authors:  Ulrich Sack; Birgit Biereder; Tino Elouahidi; Katrin Bauer; Thomas Keller; Ralf-Bodo Tröbs
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 6.  Biomarkers of acute appendicitis: systematic review and cost-benefit trade-off analysis.

Authors:  Amish Acharya; Sheraz R Markar; Melody Ni; George B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Inflammatory mediators in intra-abdominal sepsis or injury - a scoping review.

Authors:  Zhengwen Xiao; Crystal Wilson; Helen Lee Robertson; Derek J Roberts; Chad G Ball; Craig N Jenne; Andrew W Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 9.097

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.