Literature DB >> 12244738

Clinical performance of resin composite restorations after 2 years.

Claus-Peter Ernst1, Christian Buhtz, Carla Rissing, Brita Willershausen.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of a packable restorative material, after 2 years in stress-bearing posterior cavities, according to the Ryge criteria. At least two Class 2 restorations (occluso-mesial, mesial-occlusal-distal, occlusal-distal) were placed in 46 patients (36.7 +/- 16 years). In each of the restorations (lot 221, metal matrix band system, glass ionomer-cement-base in 53% of the cavities, mostly no rubber dam) an adhesive system was used. Additionally, in each patient a flowable composite was used in one of the two fillings. After 2 years, 70% of the patients were available for reevaluation. Two restorations needed to be replaced as a result of postoperative sensitivities within the observation period, and one tooth received root canal treatment. All other restored teeth remained vital. One restoration with marginal discoloration received a score of Charlie; another with secondary caries received a score of Bravo. All the others revealed excellent and clinically acceptable results. No statistically significant difference (Chi-square-test) was observed between the two groups, with and without an additional flowable composite. After 2 years, the restorative material performed clinically well, with no observable fractures in the restoration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12244738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Compend Contin Educ Dent        ISSN: 1548-8578


  6 in total

1.  Investigations on mechanical behaviour of dental composites.

Authors:  Nicoleta Ilie; Reinhard Hickel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations.

Authors:  Andrew B Schenkel; Analia Veitz-Keenan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-05

Review 3.  Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations.

Authors:  Andrew B Schenkel; Ivy Peltz; Analia Veitz-Keenan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-25

4.  Clinical evaluation of two "packable" posterior composite resins: two-year results.

Authors:  L G Lopes; D F G Cefaly; E B Franco; R F L Mondelli; J R P Lauris; M F L Navarro
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Two-year clinical performance of a packable posterior composite with and without a flowable composite liner.

Authors:  Claus-Peter Ernst; Kerem Canbek; Kadir Aksogan; Brita Willershausen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2003-07-29       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  56-month clinical performance of Class I and II resin composite restorations.

Authors:  Flavia Bittencourt Pazinatto; Ranulfo Gionordoli Neto; Linda Wang; José Mondelli; Rafael Francisco Lia Mondelli; Maria Fidela de Lima Navarro
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.698

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.