Literature DB >> 12243820

Acute symptoms, not rectally administered sucralfate, predict for late radiation proctitis: longer term follow-up of a phase III trial--Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group.

Peter C O'Brien1, C Ian Franklin, Michael G Poulsen, David J Joseph, Nigel S Spry, James W Denham.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the potential for sucralfate administered rectally to reduce the risk of late rectal morbidity in patients undergoing nonconformal radiotherapy (RT) for carcinoma of the prostate and to study the variables potentially contributing to late rectal morbidity and particularly to explore the relationship between acute and late toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighty-six patients with localized prostate carcinoma were randomized in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study to a daily enema of 3 g of sucralfate in a 15-mL suspension or the same suspension without sucralfate. The enema began the first day of RT and was continued for 2 weeks after treatment completion. The primary end point of the study was acute Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) toxicity; however, the patients were followed for an additional 5 years on a 6-month basis. The evaluation included late RTOG/EORTC toxicity and a patient self-assessment questionnaire.
RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 5 years, the Kaplan-Meier probability of late Grade 2 RTOG/EORTC toxicity was 12% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2-22%) for placebo and 5% (95% CI 0-12%) for sucralfate (p = 0.26). The probability of late rectal bleeding was 59% (95% CI 45-73%) for placebo and 54% (95% CI 40-68%) for sucralfate. No statistically significant difference was found between the treatment arms for the peak incidence of any of the other patient self-assessment variables. Cox proportional hazards modeling indicated acute RTOG/EORTC toxicity of Grade 2 or greater was associated with a hazard ratio of 2.74 (95% CI 1.31-5.73) for the development of late toxicity of Grade 1 or greater. Substituting the patient self-assessment variables for acute RTOG/EORTC toxicity revealed that rectal pain of a moderate or severe grade during RT was the best predictor of the subsequent development of late toxicity, with a hazard ratio of 3.44 (95% CI 1.68-7).
CONCLUSION: The results of this study do not support the use of sucralfate administered rectally as a method for reducing the late toxicity of nonconformal RT for prostate cancer. There appears to be an association between the development of acute and subsequent late toxicity, although the nature of this association remains to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12243820     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02931-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  25 in total

1.  Toxicity after intensity-modulated, image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthias Guckenberger; Sami Ok; Bülent Polat; Reinhart A Sweeney; Michael Flentje
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 2.  Prevention of pelvic radiation disease.

Authors:  Lorenzo Fuccio; Leonardo Frazzoni; Alessandra Guido
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2015-02-06

Review 3.  Radiation-Induced Problems in Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Jean H Ashburn; Matthew F Kalady
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-06

4.  Preliminary toxicity analysis of 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy versus intensity modulated radiation therapy on the high-dose arm of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0126 prostate cancer trial.

Authors:  Jeff M Michalski; Yan Yan; Deborah Watkins-Bruner; Walter R Bosch; Kathryn Winter; James M Galvin; Jean-Paul Bahary; Gerard C Morton; Matthew B Parliament; Howard M Sandler
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  The contribution of the cone beam Kv CT (CBKvCT) to the reduction in toxicity of prostate cancer treatment with external 3D radiotherapy.

Authors:  Antonio José Conde-Moreno; Carlos Ferrer-Albiach; Mercedes Zabaleta-Meri; Xavi J Juan-Senabre; Agustín Santos-Serra
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of radiation proctitis: a case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Rodney Eddi; Joseph R Depasquale
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.409

Review 7.  Strategic evaluation of interventions to prevent consequential late proctitis after prostate radiation therapy: new clinical trial designs should be considered.

Authors:  Timothy N Showalter; Nolan A Wages; Nitin Ohri
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 4.742

8.  Radiation colitis and proctitis.

Authors:  Gregory D Kennedy; Charles P Heise
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-02

9.  Reducing radiation-associated toxicity using online image guidance (IGRT) in prostate cancer patients undergoing dose-escalated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Martina Becker-Schiebe; Ali Abaci; Tahera Ahmad; Wolfgang Hoffmann
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-02-20

Review 10.  Gastrointestinal radiation injury: prevention and treatment.

Authors:  Abobakr K Shadad; Frank J Sullivan; Joseph D Martin; Laurence J Egan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.