Literature DB >> 12243715

Indices of torso asymmetry related to spinal deformity in scoliosis.

Jacob L Jaremko1, Philippe Poncet, Janet Ronsky, James Harder, Jean Dansereau, Hubert Labelle, Ronald F Zernicke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop indices that quantify 360 degrees torso surface asymmetry sufficiently well to estimate the Cobb angle of scoliotic spinal deformity within the clinically important 5-10 degrees range.
DESIGN: Prospective study in 48 consecutive adolescent scoliosis patients (Cobb angles 10-71 degrees ).
BACKGROUND: Scoliotic surface asymmetry has been quantified on the back surface by indices such as back surface rotation (BSR) and curvature of the spinous process line and torso centroid line, though with limited success in spinal deformity estimation. Quantification of 360 degrees torso shape may enhance surface-spine correlation and permit reduced use of harmful X-rays in scoliosis.
METHODS: For each patient a 3D torso surface model was generated concurrently with postero-anterior X-rays. We computed indices describing principal axis orientation, back surface rotation, and asymmetry of the torso centroid line, left and right half-areas and the spinous process line. We calculated correlations of each index to the Cobb angle and used stepwise regression to estimate the Cobb angle.
RESULTS: Several torso asymmetry indices correlated well to the Cobb angle (r up to 0.8). The Cobb angle was best estimated by age, rib hump and left-right variation in torso width in unbraced patients and by centroid lateral deviation in braced patients. A regression model estimated the Cobb angle from torso indices within 5 degrees in 65% of patients and 10 degrees in 88% (r=0.91, standard error=6.1 degrees ).
CONCLUSION: Consideration of 360 degrees torso surface data yielded indices that correlated well to the Cobb angle and estimated the Cobb angle within 10 degrees in 88% of cases. RELEVANCE: The torso asymmetry indices developed here show a strong surface-spine relation in scoliosis, encouraging development of a model to detect scoliosis magnitude and progression from the surface shape with minimal X-ray radiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12243715     DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(02)00099-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  10 in total

1.  Accuracy assessment of human trunk surface 3D reconstructions from an optical digitising system.

Authors:  V Pazos; F Cheriet; L Song; H Labelle; J Dansereau
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Digital stereophotogrammetry as a new technique to quantify truncal deformity: a pilot study in persons with osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  Lisa R Gabor; Andrew P Chamberlin; Ellen Levy; Monique B Perry; Holly Cintas; Scott M Paul
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.159

3.  A review of the trunk surface metrics used as Scoliosis and other deformities evaluation indices.

Authors:  Petros Patias; Theodoros B Grivas; Angelos Kaspiris; Costas Aggouris; Evangelos Drakoutos
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2010-06-29

4.  Reliability of trunk shape measurements based on 3-D surface reconstructions.

Authors:  Valérie Pazos; Farida Cheriet; Jean Danserau; Janet Ronsky; Ronald F Zernicke; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Clinical monitoring of torso deformities in scoliosis using structured splines models.

Authors:  Peter O Ajemba; Nelson G Durdle; V James Raso
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Study of trunk asymmetry in normal children and adolescents.

Authors:  Theodoros B Grivas; Elias S Vasiliadis; Georgios Koufopoulos; Dimitrios Segos; Georgios Triantafyllopoulos; Vasilios Mouzakis
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2006-11-30

7.  Determination of the human spine curve based on laser triangulation.

Authors:  Primož Poredoš; Dušan Čelan; Janez Možina; Matija Jezeršek
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 1.930

8.  Rasterstereographic measurement of scoliotic deformity.

Authors:  Burkhard Drerup
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2014-12-12

9.  Reliability of automated topographic measurements for spine deformity.

Authors:  Benjamin N Groisser; Howard J Hillstrom; Ankush Thakur; Kyle W Morse; Matthew Cunningham; M Timothy Hresko; Ron Kimmel; Alon Wolf; Roger F Widmann
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-05-08

10.  Classifying torso deformity in scoliosis using orthogonal maps of the torso.

Authors:  Peter Ajemba; Nelson Durdle; Doug Hill; James Raso
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 3.079

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.