Literature DB >> 12243539

Isolation of Campylobacter spp. from semen samples of commercial broiler breeder roosters.

N A Cox1, N J Stern, J L Wilson, M T Musgrove, R J Buhr, K L Hiett.   

Abstract

Pooled semen samples from 12 groups of mature commercial broiler breeder roosters were analyzed for the presence of Campylobacter. Each of the 12 groups was comprised of eight individuals and was sampled weekly for five consecutive weeks. Once a day, roosters were allowed to have a restricted amount of feed after the semen samples were collected by abdominal massage. This feeding schedule reduced the amount of fecal contamination in and around the vent as well as in the semen sample. For replications 1, 2, and 3, the numbers of Campylobacter-positive groups were 8, 5, and 5, respectively, out of 12. For replications 4 and 5, 6 of 8 and 6 of 11 groups were positive, respectively. Only two groups were positive for Campylobacter at all sampling times, two groups were negative each time, and eight groups produced variable results. Also, fecal droppings, external swabs of the genitalia, and semen samples were taken from individual roosters between 49 to 65 wk of age. Of the total 275 semen samples collected, 9.47% contained naturally occurring Campylobacter, whereas 9.6% of 114 fecal droppings and 7.9% of the 114 genital swabs were positive. Levels of the organism present in the fecal samples ranged from 1.0 to 4.2 log colony-forming units (CFU)/g with an average of 2.9 log CFU/g feces. For semen, the levels ranged from as low as enrichment recovery only to as high as 3.1 log CFU/ml of semen with an average of 1.2 log CFU/ml. For swabs of genitalia, the levels of Campylobacter were so low that recovery was achieved only through enrichment. These data suggest that rooster semen may serve as a vehicle for transmission of Campylobacter to the reproductive tract of the hen and subsequently to the fertile egg.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12243539     DOI: 10.1637/0005-2086(2002)046[0717:IOCSFS]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Avian Dis        ISSN: 0005-2086            Impact factor:   1.577


  7 in total

1.  Lack of evidence for vertical transmission of Campylobacter spp. in chickens.

Authors:  Kenneth A Callicott; Vala Friethriksdóttir; Jarle Reiersen; Ruff Lowman; Jean-Robert Bisaillon; Eggert Gunnarsson; Eva Berndtson; Kelli L Hiett; David S Needleman; Norman J Stern
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Dissemination of fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter spp. within an integrated commercial poultry production system.

Authors:  Umelaalim Idris; Jingrang Lu; Marie Maier; Susan Sanchez; Charles L Hofacre; Barry G Harmon; John J Maurer; Margie D Lee
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Longitudinal study of Campylobacter jejuni bacteriophages and their hosts from broiler chickens.

Authors:  P L Connerton; C M Loc Carrillo; C Swift; E Dillon; A Scott; C E D Rees; C E R Dodd; J Frost; I F Connerton
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Retrospective study of Campylobacter infection in a zoological collection.

Authors:  Maged M Taema; James C Bull; Shaheed K Macgregor; Edmund J Flach; Wayne S Boardman; Andrew D Routh
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Campylobacter and Arcobacter species in food-producing animals: prevalence at primary production and during slaughter.

Authors:  Nompumelelo Shange; Pieter Gouws; Louwrens C Hoffman
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Molecular epidemiology of Campylobacter isolates from poultry production units in southern Ireland.

Authors:  Emer O'Mahony; James F Buckley; Declan Bolton; Paul Whyte; Séamus Fanning
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effects of different mating strategies in broiler breeder during peak and postpeak phase on subsequent broiler performance.

Authors:  Muhammad Shabir Shaheen; Shahid Mehmood; Athar Mahmud; Amjad Riaz
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.352

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.