Phytotoxicity of coloured substances: is Lemna duckweed an alternative to the algal growth inhibition test?

Coloured substances cause problems when interpreting algal tests, because effects due to light absorption can interact with potential toxicity. The Lemna Duckweed growth inhibition test can complement the algal test, on condition that the test is performed on a black, not reflecting surface. On white surfaces, test solution colour can strongly impact Lemna growth. For example, average control sample growth rate of is much higher on white surfaces (0.362 d(-1)) than on black surfaces (0.284 d(-1)). We found that 10 mg l(-1) of the dyestuff "Brilliant Blue R spezial" inhibited average Lemna growth rate about 22% on white surfaces but did not inhibit growth on black surfaces. The reason for this difference stems from the difference in amount of light reflected from below the test beakers. With Brilliant Blue on white surfaces, the test solution colour reduces utilizable light and causes a deterioration of light conditions, whereas on a black surfaces, reflected light is absent a priori, and thus no inhibiting effect was measured. Of particular importance is the choice of test parameter. With Brilliant Blue, a LOEC for average growth rate, based on frond numbers, of 320 mg l(-1) was determined. However, when average growth rate was calculated using dry weights of the plants, the LOEC decreased clearly to 1.0 mg l(-1). In this study, the Lemna test was much more sensitive than the algal test. We recommend Lemna tests be used in addition to algal tests, because doing so may significantly improve the assessment of phytotoxicity of chemicals and sewage.