BACKGROUND: A series of surveys were conducted to assess the attitudes of the public, and other groups, toward those with schizophrenia. The aim of these surveys was to aid in the planning and evaluation of the WPA anti-stigma initiative in Alberta, Canada. METHOD: A questionnaire was devised and administered via telephone to over 1,200 individuals in three Alberta cities, and in paper and pencil format to 40 members of the Schizophrenia Society of Alberta and 67 medical students. RESULTS: In contrast to some earlier findings, "loss of mind" was rated to be more disabling than any other handicapping condition. In general, respondents showed a relatively sophisticated understanding of schizophrenia and a higher level of acceptance than might have been predicted. Nonetheless, this acceptance was not as high for situations where closer personal contact was likely, and fears of dangerousness continue to be associated with schizophrenia. The majority of respondents, however, felt that treatment aided those with schizophrenia, expressed support for progressive programmes for the mentally ill, and stated that they would be willing to pay higher taxes so that programming could be improved. CONCLUSIONS: The results do not support the utility of a broad approach for an anti-stigma campaign, but rather suggest a more specific focus, such as perceived dangerousness.
BACKGROUND: A series of surveys were conducted to assess the attitudes of the public, and other groups, toward those with schizophrenia. The aim of these surveys was to aid in the planning and evaluation of the WPA anti-stigma initiative in Alberta, Canada. METHOD: A questionnaire was devised and administered via telephone to over 1,200 individuals in three Alberta cities, and in paper and pencil format to 40 members of the Schizophrenia Society of Alberta and 67 medical students. RESULTS: In contrast to some earlier findings, "loss of mind" was rated to be more disabling than any other handicapping condition. In general, respondents showed a relatively sophisticated understanding of schizophrenia and a higher level of acceptance than might have been predicted. Nonetheless, this acceptance was not as high for situations where closer personal contact was likely, and fears of dangerousness continue to be associated with schizophrenia. The majority of respondents, however, felt that treatment aided those with schizophrenia, expressed support for progressive programmes for the mentally ill, and stated that they would be willing to pay higher taxes so that programming could be improved. CONCLUSIONS: The results do not support the utility of a broad approach for an anti-stigma campaign, but rather suggest a more specific focus, such as perceived dangerousness.
Authors: Lawrence H Yang; Graciete Lo; Ahtoy J WonPat-Borja; Daisy R Singla; Bruce G Link; Michael R Phillips Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2011-11-11 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: K M Keyes; M L Hatzenbuehler; K A McLaughlin; B Link; M Olfson; B F Grant; D Hasin Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2010-11-02 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Eduardo Adrian Leiderman; Gustavo Vazquez; Candela Berizzo; Ana Bonifacio; Noelia Bruscoli; Juan I Capria; Betina Ehrenhaus; Manuel Guerrero; Maria Guerrero; Maria Lolich; Roumen Milev Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2010-02-27 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Deidre M Anglin; Michelle I Greenspoon; Quenesha Lighty; Cheryl M Corcoran; Lawrence H Yang Journal: Early Interv Psychiatry Date: 2013-04-18 Impact factor: 2.732