Literature DB >> 12242123

Indicators of late normal tissue response after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: fibroblasts, lymphocytes, genetics, DNA repair, and chromosome aberrations.

Kerstin Borgmann1, Barbara Röper, Rafaat El-Awady, Sophie Brackrock, Maika Bigalke, Tilo Dörk, Winfried Alberti, Ekkehard Dikomey, Jochen Dahm-Daphi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between late tissue response after radiotherapy, cellular sensitivity and DNA repair capacity measured in dermal fibroblasts and chromosomal aberrations measured in lymphocytes. The study was in particular designed to compare cellular parameters of patients with maximum differences in late tissue reactions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was performed with 16 pair-wise matched head and neck cancer patients 2-7 years after curative therapy exhibiting maximum differences (grade 1 vs. grade 3) in late normal tissue reactions. Clinical endpoints were fibrosis, telangiectasia, mucositis and xerostomia using the radiation therapy oncology group score. Patients with grade 3 reactions were tested for mutations in ataxia telangiectasia (AT), Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome (NBS), MRE11, RAD50 and DNA ligase IV genes by means of polymerase chain reaction-single-strand conformation polymorphism and sequencing analysis. Skin fibroblasts obtained from biopsies were used to determine the cellular sensitivity by colony formation and the induction and repair of DNA double-strand breaks (dsb) using constant-field gel electrophoresis. Lymphocytes were taken to measure chromosomal damage either in metaphase using conventional chromosome analysis or in G(0) using premature chromosome condensation (PCC)-technique.
RESULTS: Patients with extreme late reactions (grade 3) showed no evidence for an AT, NBS, MRE11 or RAD50 mutation. Studies with fibroblasts revealed that extreme late reactions were associated neither with a pronounced cellular radiosensitivity nor with a difference in dsb repair capacity. In contrast, there was a significant difference in chromosomal damage measured in lymphocytes. After in vitro irradiation with 6Gy, lymphocytes taken from overreacting patients showed on average a significantly higher number of lethal aberrations than lymphocytes isolated from patients with mild reactions (7.2+/-0.8 vs. 5.0+/-0.3). Similar differences were found for PCC fragments.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that lymphocytes are more promising than fibroblasts to predict patient's normal tissue response after radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12242123     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(02)00167-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  14 in total

1.  Suppression of vascular endothelial growth factor via siRNA interference modulates the biological behavior of human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Hai B Zhou; Yi F Yin; Yan Hu; Xin Li; Li Y Zou; Yong J Li; Yu Gu; Bao Q Ou; Juan Fu; Jun H Du; Gang Wu
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Dicentric Dose Estimates for Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy in the RTGene Study to Assess Blood Dosimetric Models and the New Bayesian Method for Gradient Exposure.

Authors:  Jayne Moquet; Manuel Higueras; Ellen Donovan; Sue Boyle; Stephen Barnard; Clare Bricknell; Mingzhu Sun; Lone Gothard; Grainne O'Brien; Lourdes Cruz-Garcia; Christophe Badie; Elizabeth Ainsbury; Navita Somaiah
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 3.  [Prediction of the reaction of normal tissue and tumor cells to radiotherapy].

Authors:  E Dikomey; J Dahm-Daphi; L Distel
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Simultaneous analysis of p53 protein expression and cell proliferation in irradiated human lymphocytes by flow cytometry.

Authors:  Rafael de Freitas E Silva; Neyliane Frassinetti Gonçalves Dos Santos; Valéria Rěgo Alves Pereira; Ademir Amaral
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 5.  Radiogenomics: A systems biology approach to understanding genetic risk factors for radiotherapy toxicity?

Authors:  Carsten Herskind; Christopher J Talbot; Sarah L Kerns; Marlon R Veldwijk; Barry S Rosenstein; Catharine M L West
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 8.679

6.  Chromosomal radiosensitivity and acute radiation side effects after radiotherapy in tumour patients--a follow-up study.

Authors:  Reinhard Huber; Herbert Braselmann; Hans Geinitz; Irene Jaehnert; Adolf Baumgartner; Reinhard Thamm; Markus Figel; Michael Molls; Horst Zitzelsberger
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  A bioinformatics filtering strategy for identifying radiation response biomarker candidates.

Authors:  Jung Hun Oh; Harry P Wong; Xiaowei Wang; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparative analysis of three functional predictive assays in lymphocytes of patients with breast and gynaecological cancer treated by radiotherapy.

Authors:  Anna Padjas; Piotr Kedzierawski; Agnieszka Florek; Pawel Kukolowicz; Tomasz Kuszewski; Stanislaw Góźdz; Anna Lankoff; Andrzej Wojcik; Halina Lisowska
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2012-12-28

9.  Analysis of gene expression using gene sets discriminates cancer patients with and without late radiation toxicity.

Authors:  J Peter Svensson; Lukas J A Stalpers; Rebecca E E Esveldt-van Lange; Nicolaas A P Franken; Jaap Haveman; Binie Klein; Ingela Turesson; Harry Vrieling; Micheline Giphart-Gassler
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Biomarkers and mechanisms of FANCD2 function.

Authors:  Henning Willers; Lisa A Kachnic; Chen-Mei Luo; Li Li; Martin Purschke; Kerstin Borgmann; Kathryn D Held; Simon N Powell
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2008
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.