Literature DB >> 12242072

Success of serial external electrical cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation in maintaining sinus rhythm; a randomized study.

E Bertaglia1, D D'Este, F Zerbo, F Zoppo, P Delise, P Pascotto.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aim of this prospective, randomized study was to determine the efficacy of a serial external electrical cardioversion strategy in maintaining sinus rhythm after 12 months in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Ninety patients with persistent atrial fibrillation lasting more than 72 h but less than 1 year were randomized in a one to one fashion to repetition of up to two electrical cardioversions in the event of relapse of atrial fibrillation detected within 1 month of the previous electrical cardioversion (Group AGG), or to non-treatment of atrial fibrillation relapse (Group CTL). ECGs were scheduled at 6 h, 7 days, and 1 month. Clinical examination and ECGs were repeated during the 6-month and 12-month follow-up examinations. Echocardiography was repeated during the 6-month follow-up examination. Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were similar in the two groups. All patients were treated with antiarrhythmic drugs before electrical cardioversion and throughout follow-up. After 12 months, sinus rhythm was maintained in 53% of Group AGG patients and in 29% of Group CTL patients (P<0.03). After 6 months, left ventricular ejection fraction had recovered significantly only in Group AGG (56.8 +/- 9.0% at enrollment vs 60.4 +/- 9.4% at 6 months,P <0.001).
CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that an aggressive policy towards persistent atrial fibrillation by means of repetition of electrical cardioversion after early atrial fibrillation recurrence is useful in maintaining sinus rhythm after 12 months. Copyright 2002 The European Society of Cardiology

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12242072     DOI: 10.1053/euhj.2002.3167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  7 in total

1.  Persistent atrial fibrillation: rate control or rhythm control. Rate control is not inferior to rhythm control.

Authors:  Christopher J Boos; Ranjit S More; Jorg Carlsson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-06-28

2.  Importance of using biphasic shock waveforms for cardioversion from atrial fibrillation: an unresolved issue.

Authors:  J M Morgan
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  A review of factors associated with maintenance of sinus rhythm after elective electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Veronika Ecker; Charles Knoery; Gordon Rushworth; Ian Rudd; Astrid Ortner; David Begley; Stephen J Leslie
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.882

4.  Improvement of the myocardial performance index in atrial fibrilation patients treated with amiodarone after cardioversion.

Authors:  Feyzullah Besli; Cengiz Basar; Mesut Kecebas; Yasin Turker
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  The presence of fragmented QRS may predict the recurrence of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation after successful electrical cardioversion.

Authors:  Hayati Eren; Ülker Kaya; Lütfi Öcal; Ahmet Şenbaş; Macit Kalçık
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 1.468

6.  Rate-control or rhythm-control: where do we stand?

Authors:  L Testa; G Trotta; A Dello Russo; M Casella; G Pelargonio; F Andreotti; F Bellocci
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2005-10-01

7.  Electrocardiographic predictors of early recurrence of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Ji-Hoon Choi; Hee-Jin Kwon; Hye Ree Kim; Seung-Jung Park; June Soo Kim; Young Keun On; Kyoung-Min Park
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 1.468

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.