Literature DB >> 12241129

Risk management strategies in the Physicians' Desk Reference product labels for pregnancy category X drugs.

Kathleen Uhl1, Dianne L Kennedy, Sandra L Kweder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Drugs that carry a concern for teratogenicity are often classified as pregnancy category X in the drug label and contraindicated for use during pregnancy. Many drug labels can be found in the Physicians' Desk Reference (PDR), a widely used source of drug information by American clinicians and patients.
OBJECTIVE: To review product labelling in the electronic PDR for the pregnancy category X products for pregnancy prevention risk management components in labelling.
METHODS: The electronic version of the 2001 and 2002 PDR was searched for 'pregnancy category X' products using the full text search feature. All product labels identified were retrieved and reviewed for trade name, generic name, manufacturer and indication. Product labels were manually searched for any pregnancy prevention risk management strategies included in labelling. Those labels that had specific pregnancy prevention risk management strategies were further evaluated.
RESULTS: One hundred and seventeen pregnancy category X products were obtained from 2249 products searched in the 2001 PDR database and 124 pregnancy category X products were obtained from the 2150 products in the 2002 PDR database. All pregnancy category X products identified were drug products. The label/package insert for each drug was reviewed to identify risk management strategies for pregnancy prevention. The majority of the labels include as the sole risk management strategy either a black box warning and/or a contraindication for use in women who are or may become pregnant. Only 13 drugs contained specific pregnancy prevention risk management strategies in the label directing the clinician and/or patient, e.g. frequency of pregnancy testing, number and type of contraception methods. Two drugs, bexarotene capsules and gel, were only included in the 2001 PDR. Three drugs, isotretinoin, acitretin, and thalidomide, have formal pregnancy prevention risk management programmes.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the varied risk management approaches in labelling for pregnancy prevention for pregnancy category X drugs. There is a need for consistency in the classification of pregnancy category X products and the pregnancy prevention risk management strategies utilised in the labelling for them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12241129     DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200225120-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  9 in total

1.  FDA labeling system for drugs in pregnancy.

Authors:  L A Boothby; P L Doering
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.154

2.  Prescription of drugs during pregnancy in France.

Authors:  I Lacroix; C Damase-Michel; M Lapeyre-Mestre; J L Montastruc
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-11-18       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Physicians' sources of information about teratogenic effects of drugs.

Authors:  R C Hatton; P L Doering; J L Frias
Journal:  Drug Inf J       Date:  1982 Jul-Sep

4.  The Physicians' Desk Reference. Problems and possible improvements.

Authors:  J S Cohen; P A Insel
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1996-07-08

5.  Content and format of labeling for human prescription drugs; pregnancy labeling; public hearing--FDA. Notice of public hearing; request for comments.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  1997-07-31

6.  Pregnancy labeling.

Authors: 
Journal:  FDA Drug Bull       Date:  1979-09

7.  Perception of teratogenic risk of common medicines.

Authors:  E Sanz; T Gómez-López; M J Martínez-Quintas
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.435

8.  Prescribing during pregnancy and lactation with reference to the Swedish classification system. A population-based study among Danish women.

Authors:  C Olesen; H T Sørensen; L de Jong-van den Berg; J Olsen; F H Steffensen
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.636

9.  Perception of teratogenic risk by pregnant women exposed to drugs and chemicals during the first trimester.

Authors:  G Koren; M Bologa; D Long; Y Feldman; N H Shear
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 8.661

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Assessment of foetal risk associated with 93 non-US-FDA approved medications during pregnancy.

Authors:  Ahmed H Al-Jedai; Sakra S Balhareth; Roaa A Algain
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Can we ensure the safe use of known human teratogens? Introduction of generic isotretinoin in the US as an example.

Authors:  Margaret A Honein; Cynthia A Moore; J David Erickson
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  A Modified Murine Embryonic Stem Cell Test for Evaluating the Teratogenic Effects of Drugs on Early Embryogenesis.

Authors:  Ruoxing Yu; Norio Miyamura; Yoshimi Okamoto-Uchida; Norie Arima; Mari Ishigami-Yuasa; Hiroyuki Kagechika; Hiroshi Nishina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Developmental differences in the expression of ABC transporters at rat brain barrier interfaces following chronic exposure to diallyl sulfide.

Authors:  Liam M Koehn; Katarzyna M Dziegielewska; Kjeld Møllgård; Elodie Saudrais; Nathalie Strazielle; Jean-Francois Ghersi-Egea; Norman R Saunders; Mark D Habgood
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Evaluating drug targets through human loss-of-function genetic variation.

Authors:  Eric Vallabh Minikel; Konrad J Karczewski; Hilary C Martin; Beryl B Cummings; Nicola Whiffin; Daniel Rhodes; Jessica Alföldi; Richard C Trembath; David A van Heel; Mark J Daly; Stuart L Schreiber; Daniel G MacArthur
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 49.962

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.